John Edwards or Obama?
2006-12-28 01:42:41 · 14 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
neither
2006-12-28 01:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by Abu 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If I HAD to chose from those two, I would pick Obama. I know Edwards is strange and can't control his temper (remember the tantrums in the last Presidential election he ran in?)
I don't know enough about Obama's actual stands and plans to deal with the issues he would face as President, though, to know how well he would represent our nation. I also think that while he shows a lot of promise, he does not have enough experience yet to be President.
2006-12-28 09:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would like more choices or more information about these two men before making a decision. However to katsulover who said these men aren't "smart enough" to be president. I beg to differ. John Edwards is a briliiant trial attorney which may mean nothing to some, but let me tell you, the world is filled with attorneys but few are trial attorneys and even fewer are good at it. As for Obama, he's extremely intelligent, a Harvard Law graduate, published his first book long before he became a politician.
I just don't know where these men stand on the issues which leaves me unable to support either. But I don't doubt their intelligence one bit.
2006-12-28 10:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by Betty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mace Windu. He's got his prioritys straight, and will continue the war until victory is official. and he's got a cool lighsaber. I don't argue with lightsabers.
Seriously, though Edwards. I'd prefer John McCain or Guiliani or Condi, but I've met him and talked to him and he's a good guy. I am a republican, but I can stand him. not Hillary or Obama, but Edwards isn't bad.
2006-12-28 09:46:46 · answer #4 · answered by daniel g 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Neither is qualified to lead this country.I'm not sure any of the candidates so far are presidential material.But then again look at GWB hes totally unqualified and proves it every day.
Both Edwards and Obama are intelligent attractive men but not "smart" enough to be president.Of the two Id take Obama
because of the "untried" factor.It cant get much worse than what GWB has given us.
2006-12-28 09:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would like to see Gen. Wesley Clark (retired) run again. Here is an honest man, well-regarded by both friend and (former) foes (he was supreme commander of NATO forces). He would bring integrity and honesty to the job as well as the knowledge of how and when to properly use force.
2006-12-28 09:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by williamh772 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Condi Rice
2006-12-28 09:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Newt Gingrich or any Republican nominee. The Democrats just want to raise taxes and make the Federal government larger. They are for abortion.
They are for homosexual marriages(very bad).
2006-12-28 09:49:18 · answer #8 · answered by Michael W 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
So my only choice is an ambulance chaser and a racist socialist mulatto?
I choose I guess to remain one of those 4% who vote, but do not vote for president.
2006-12-28 09:45:53 · answer #9 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Neither...My vote is for Robin Williams.
2006-12-28 09:46:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i would actually preffer none of them i want Hillary Clinton to run for president because america needs a mother and since she is one i thnk america would be an even better place!
2006-12-28 09:45:53 · answer #11 · answered by Bubblegum_Faeire 3 · 0⤊ 7⤋