sure VAN NISTELROOY he ia awsome!!!!!!!!!!!! but henry is great striker too .
2006-12-28 01:14:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Duaa-07 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to say Henry because of the ability he displays before hitting the back of the net. He has a greater capacity to set up and work the goal, not just hit it. Ruud is good, but Henry's vision is far more developed.
2006-12-28 15:12:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by andygurl 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Henry!
2006-12-29 08:01:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr. Zizou 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yea Nistelrooy is the best striker!
2006-12-28 08:50:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pinky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thierry Henry.
2006-12-28 10:33:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by foongwk140804 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Henry forever
2006-12-28 11:39:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by M.K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
van Nistelrooy only waits in front of the goal area for an opportunity to score, he is rarely the play maker of a beautiful goal.
2006-12-28 16:47:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by At Last WC2010 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Henry is better cause Ruud boy is only a goal poacher.
2006-12-28 10:10:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by cajadman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Henry is d best striker but Ruddi is also gud but not as gud as Henry
2006-12-28 08:57:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dj Badboy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd definitely choose Henry.
2006-12-28 08:49:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by kellogs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
based on pure skill and one on one striking ability... there is no one with the speed and creativity that Henry pocesses... when he gets the ball at anytime he can create his own shot...
90% of Ruddi's goals are penalties and goal poaching... and lets also looks at his poor World Cup preformaces compared to Henry..
Henry hands down
2006-12-28 08:42:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by ShinerKazzmo 3
·
1⤊
0⤋