... in fact there were some bombs in the twin towers. I wonder: who put them? How?
Will we ever know the truth one day?
2006-12-27 22:34:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
very sorry for you. I am a civil engineer and the twin towers were not in wood like all your houses.
America is the most powerful country and want to be forever.
you will never know the truth because you don't want to know it!
As soon as it happened I said that an airplane could not destroy a building like that, there is not scientific reason, but bombs.
Very sorry for you.
IN GOD WE TRUST? YOU SHOULD START TRUSTING IN YOUR BRAINS! OPEN YOUR EYES!
2006-12-27 22:46:21 · update #1
I have never said americans put the bombs...
2006-12-27 22:51:09 · update #2
ANYWAY i am not insulting any one: i am sorry for every victim of 9/11, but also of the WAR, not only american soldiers, but also all the european and iraqi soldiers, poor iraqi families (with no fault if Bush like the oil), journalists and turists from anywhere and of course I have missed some one.
Open your mind
2006-12-27 22:53:50 · update #3
the airplane is symbolic and easier to find the responsables... ;-)
2006-12-27 22:54:52 · update #4
So, you're a civil engineer. You don't seem to have any grasp on grammar, and you don't express yourself very well. Its clear you have bought into the conspiracy theory.
No one can claim to be an expert on whether or not a plane can bring a building down. This had never happened before 9-11. Please don't tell me about the plane that flew into the Empire State Building. That building is concrete.
I have an open mind, but I don't allow it to be filled with this drivel.
2006-12-27 23:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by Firespider 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is a myth - there were no bombs in the twin towers. The weight of a 767, the heat from the burning jet fuel, and the stripping of the heat shielding from the steel support beams ALL contributed to the collapse of the towers. The buildings were designed before airplanes as big as the 767s existed. Its amazing that they stood as long as they did - they exceeded their design performance.
2006-12-28 06:51:44 · answer #2 · answered by Paul H 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oh, so you're a civil engineer. Well, we all know how infallible they can be. Let's just think a minute....levees in New Orleans were blessed by civil engineers.
Sorry, not buying the conspiracy theories. Too many people would have to be in on it. No one can keep a secret that well. There would be more real evidence beyond the the wild speculation that is going on.
2006-12-28 09:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If they wanted to bring it down with bombs. They could have done it without planes similar to Oklahoma bombing. The planes did blow out fire insulation forms and they had very light fire protection forms. High rise buildings like those save weights via lighter materials or too much stress go to its base. So its balance of safety/structural integrity/cost/rules&building code. Because of initial blast of fire protection to metal beems that support whole lot of weight they began softening quickly until they started to bend. After bending for while they snapped. Once the floors near crash site snapped off it was chain reaction from there on. People do know the truth. And official stories do add up regarding twin towers. But many think just because it looks unlikely or even impossible by naked eyes that it is. It's like believing in magic after seeing David Blaine floating in air. Do you think David Blaine or David Copperfield can really fly?
WTC designers knows how the towers failed and they would have been the first to come out to public and tell their opinion if they saw something odd. After all they got huge reputation riding on their buildings. No one is going to sit and watch if their building have been bombed and disguised as plane crash. These guys are not stupid. They know how the towers failed and know it wasn't bomb. They did admit they didn't expect spectacular crashes like the 911 although they did build it to stand against possible jet crash. That's why building held up well as it did on that day.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11%2C_2001_attacks#Media
2006-12-28 06:52:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Really? Or did you not see the GIANT F*CKING PLANES crash into the towers? The buildings fell when the parts that were damaged from the crashes finally gave way, taking the rest with it. If there were bombs, there probably would have been, I don't know, another explosion.
Seriously. Go read a book.
2006-12-28 06:42:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would imagine that there are very few buildings that would stand up to being hit by and explosion of several hundred tonnes of jet fuel.
Once the structure is compromised, thats it. Plus heat does very funny things to metal. Like melting it, weakening it.
Get over it - no conspiracy.
2006-12-28 06:44:15 · answer #6 · answered by gwen 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You're a civil engineer and I'm a physicist, that makes both of us idiots.
2006-12-28 09:32:56 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Apparently you put a lot of trust in crack, Your a stupid little man. And you shame everyone, ie friends, families, victims, lost at the hands of terrorist cowards. You need help moron!
2006-12-28 06:50:03 · answer #8 · answered by Chupacabra! 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did you pass the course?
2006-12-28 11:58:13 · answer #9 · answered by roses are red 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
why was one of your mates there? Quiet the little supporter for the evil one aren't you?I can tell by your negative scoring on other questions, answers you didn't like at all
2006-12-28 07:25:27 · answer #10 · answered by deb m 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋