Has this fact just proved your point ?
"Hello pax veritas
You have posted content to Yahoo! Answers in violation of our Community Guidelines. As a result, your content has been deleted.
Deleted Questions: Demonstrate Love? 9 answers
Deleted Questions: Demonstrate Hate? 6 answers
Question Details:
Reason of Violation:Chatting & Personal Communications
If you have feedback on this violation, please contact Customer Care.
Yahoo! Answers Team"
2006-12-27 21:51:28 · 10 answers · asked by pax veritas 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
los : No. The academic answers to questions asked over the last few days lead to these questions.
To whoever that created this with the intention of the two queries "Demonstrate Love" and Demonstrate Hate", of which both answers were not only illustrated linguisticaly in the negative sense but demonstrated, proved beyond a certain doubt of traditional Greek based thinking that certain issues require an action, beyond what words can express.
2006-12-27 22:05:13 · update #1
Beyond words? This is answers,does this not "speak for itself?
Been to this place once/not worth the effort to explain to"those whose sole purpose,is to gripe when given a difinitive answer.
Don't worry ! Keep answering "all" do not have small mind's.
2006-12-28 12:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I got a question deleted myself, it was discussing anthropological approaches to love worldwide.
Anyway, down to business.
Philosophy can be used to discuss anything anytime anywhere. The act of questioning is important. Answering... not so important.
Prove something... not really. Theories, anyway, even in philosophy of science. (Even Kuhn.)
Argue out... yes.
I think in Yahoo Answers, there is a limit imposed on certain philosophical questions. Don't ask me why. I think certain key words trigger the computerised censor, if there is one.
2006-12-27 21:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by Balaboo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
These Yahoo guys have their heads a bit up their own backsides I think. Censorship has no place on the interweb, in my view.
Logic can be used to prove things of a philosophical nature, in a number of ways.
2006-12-27 22:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
under stamford encyclpedia of emotions this subject is gone into great detail and is a seperate subject of philosophy and needs lots of study to get to a conclusion
2006-12-27 22:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by P T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speed cameras !
Just think of it as receiving a Notice of Intended Prosecution.
And three extra "points" towards your goal.
x x l o l
2006-12-27 22:00:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You should certainly protest.... truly I see no chatting or personal communication in these questions at all.... injustice if these interesting questions have been deleted..... wonder why anyone complained on these innocuous questions!
2006-12-27 21:59:42 · answer #6 · answered by small 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes indeed it can i take AS philosophy and as a matter of fact we have just started this particular subject. you should try looking into Descartes and Bertrand Russell.
2006-12-27 22:18:48 · answer #7 · answered by mattie_peters 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree, in the end words are not enough,
it is all about what we do in life not what we say.
2006-12-27 22:33:24 · answer #8 · answered by farshadowman 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does any of this actually matter?
2006-12-27 21:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by los 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES I THINK IT CAN.
2006-12-27 22:16:27 · answer #10 · answered by wilma p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋