It seems to me that almost all of the rule changes in football have favoured the rich clubs over the poorer ones to the overall detriment of the game, the substitute rule being one.
The very rich clubs can fill the bench with top class players where the smaller clubs cannot compete.
The result is an ever widening gap between top and bottom clubs.
In fact I'm surprised that the European Commission hasn't jumped on the major clubs for forming an illegal cartel.
That's my view what's your's?
2006-12-27 21:36:13 · 8 answers · asked by Barrie G 3 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
I guess yes ,
i still remember my parants got a sony tv we have used alomost 15 to 16 years, but now a days we do have so many options & technologyes that make us strees full we have to do so much work to accomplished our virtual fantasies, like if you are driveing bmw you r looking for Mercidies or hummer, if you live in 200,000 house you look for 1 million house, i remmmber my family got a Minolta camera 35 mm , they have spent his whole life whit that camera, now i ve changed almost 8 digital cameras within 4 years .... its a rat race
2006-12-27 21:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by bill4pill 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Barrie But no substitutes brings back another problem. Notably "taking players out".
Perhaps a tit for tat rule. i.e. if a player is injured and unable to continue. the opposing side must chose a player to sit out also.(after incurring red card if appropriate) .
Good players should play the game not warm the bench. The big names would still gravitate to the rich teams but the poorer teams should tend to field a more competitive team. A good game is a hard fought, close and clean game.
2006-12-28 06:20:56 · answer #2 · answered by Glenn B 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Changing the rules means that football is growing as a sport ..getting back to old days means that we are not trying to more supported by people..for Substitution...dont you think that if a player is injured in a game forexample the coach has the right to switch him with another player..it wont be fair if he doesnt have the right because it was the other player who injured him in the first place..if a player got a red card..dont you think that the coach has the right to substitute 2 other players to change the tactics of the game..??
i think that substitutions should be allowd
2006-12-28 07:51:36 · answer #3 · answered by Herbicide 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should go to the days, when sport is sport. A love of the game. Not just another greedy, big business with greedy, overpaid dummies. And, lets get rid of the fanatical fans too, while were at it. { the violent ones, I mean}..The brawlers and hateful nonsense over a..... GAME!! Get a grip...and a life.
2006-12-28 05:44:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Defiantly not the soccer players get tired of running for a hour you know!
2006-12-28 15:58:05 · answer #5 · answered by мяs. мαтεяαzzι 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i think the rule now is fair cause all of your players need to play sometimes even if they have to play for ten seconds.
2006-12-28 06:09:42 · answer #6 · answered by shah 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I do have opinion similar to yours...
2006-12-28 05:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by Laura 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY!
2006-12-28 05:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Zizou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋