BECAUSE OUR GOVERNMENT IS HYPOCRITAL CONSERVATIVE FAVORISTS , but if it makes you feel better, the latinos didn't get squat too!
2006-12-27 20:23:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by ¡El lobo del norte del fuego! 1
·
7⤊
9⤋
The united college fund is supported by other Blacks who donate the funds. The 40 acres and the mule was never given out. As demanded that the White southerns deserved to be brought back to it's former glory. As the war was not about slavery but the retaining of States who thought they could leave. Slaves were freed in the southern states the succeed not southern states who stayed with the union. And Lindon and abolitionist had reservations in mind when after the war. Mainly they looked at South America. As the slaves should be free but the white population should not have to suffer with living with them. And slave were sold into slavery by African. Reparations will never happen. Nor do I think that People will ever tell the whole truth of slavery in 'history' class. Why should they. I think a great many a praying it will be a forgotten subject in 30 or 40 years. My great grandmother was slave. I met her she died in the 70's and yes she was very old and I was young but I remember her just the same. So I will be the generation that will take it to my grave.
2006-12-27 22:30:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ScottishhoustonGirl 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
perhaps if slavery happened in Germany simply by fact the holocaust did, the German government might've paid out. Reparations have been initially agreed upon for emancipated slaves by way of the 40 acres and a mule settlement. regrettably, lots of that settlement grow to be no longer fulfilled and the government somewhat lots became it truly is lower back on making any attempt to assimilate former slaves. This a great deal contributed to the continued civil rights conflict and the emotional and psychological injury that generations of blacks have suffered provided that slavery. consequently, the present argument for slavery reparations for the present descendants of slaves is lifelike. the difficulty is that it truly is been see you later provided that slavery, figuring out who's truly deserving and qualified is a topic. Secondly, the political momentum would not exist, so reparations is an unrealistic expectation. In Nazi Germany, the political will did exist for jewish reparations simply by fact of huge international tension against a susceptible united states that had in simple terms lost a considerable conflict.
2016-10-28 13:06:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"40 acres and a mule" was not intended to be reparations. After recapturing portions of the south, Gen Sherman found himself with copious land and livestock, parsed it out to former slaves because it was slowing his army down. The white southerners whod fled the war came back and reclaimed all of the land with relative ease, even though Johnson made it tough on the rich out of spite, having grown up poor. But make no mistake, NO regard was made by the U.S. government to right the wrongs imposed upon millions of Africans.
Slaves absolutely, unequivocably deserved reparations. Instead of reparations, they were further oppressed by discriminatory laws, both written and unwritten. This is recent history, people. It is no coincedence blacks have no wealth, because in the 50's whites were granted loans for home ownership and blacks were not. Yes, blacks deserve reparations.
2016-01-10 14:12:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
in the case of the Jewish people, Japanese and Native Americans, they were given back what was originally taken. they weren't compensated. It's like if someone grabbed your wallet, then tossed you into a hellish prison. then later someone else came and was like "sorry about that, we caught the guy, here's your wallet back"
black slaves came to this country with nothing. for their efforts in the war against the south, they were given their freedom. promises were made to some about land, but was not followed through. some slaves did obtain their previous owners' land. others did not. some blacks weren't slaves and thus deserved nothing. some blacks were slave owners, and again, deserved nothing. however, during reconstruction blacks were doing pretty well. it is what came after that, that was devastating- towns being burned down, homes, churches. therefore, the many that did see compensation for their efforts later saw it burned to the ground by others.
2006-12-28 02:14:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by smm 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I see you enslaved matrix living crackers talking that black people today shouldn t get reparations. Well how about after slavery? Nothing then either. Black people disn t want **** from you motherfuckers. You motherfuckers didn t want to see us prosper so your government attacked and killed us after slavery. We were doing better than you and you got mad. Personally I think white people are dumb and enslaved by fear today. You are pretty worthless. You have no culture in this country. Only history Americans have is they were war mongering slave owners who raped and hung people from trees. The king of England should not have let your ancestors out them prisons. Should have kept you locked up where you belong
2015-05-21 01:20:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tony Lawrence 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
I've never thought of that before. Here in Australia aborigines do get some land rights and payments, but there is still much to be accounted for, such as the stolen generation, when black babies were taken away from their mothers and put into white familes. All I can say is that it does seem unfair.
2006-12-27 20:25:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Actually small reparations were made. Ever hear of "the 40 acres and a mule"? Now don't mistakenly think I feel that this was adequate, but it was a reparation.
You can not compare what happened to Native Americans to what happened to the people now referred to as African Americans. Yes you guys were used as farm equipment and other labor machines, but what the Native Americans experienced was out and out genocide. The only groups that can claim to remotely understand what this would be the Jews, Gypsies and other of Hitler's undesirables that endured the Holocaust. And even they can't because their suffering was rather short compared to the Native Americans. At least they wanted to keep the slaves reasonably healthy and alive to work. Natives were purposely killed off by gun and disease. Ever heard of small pox blankets? These were part of the US Government rations to the Natives after they rounded them up off of their land, and everything they had was taken. They would include in the rations disease contaminated supplies to help rid themselves to the "nuisance" of the "Indian".
So I guess to answer your question Jews of the Holocaust got paid because an International Tribunal determined the atrocities so heinous as to warrant reparation. Interestingly enough it doesn't even touch the wealth stolen from the concentration camp internees. Hell, Swiss banks were in the news about 6 years ago because of all of these accounts opened by the Nazis that hadn't been claimed. The gold bars in the vaults were made from melting down their stolen jewelry and TEETH!
2006-12-27 20:53:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by sarcasm_gurl 2
·
6⤊
7⤋
Well millions of people died for no reason whatsoever in the Holocaust and many of them are still alive and remember that horrible event!! its sad for you to think that money will bring back all the suffering of these people because I think they would rather have the family they lost back than any amount of money they receive. And like someone else on here said if everyone had to compensate someone for any harm they caused we would all be paying someone at this moment.
2006-12-27 20:50:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by cHiKiBaBe 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
The
2016-05-07 14:55:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Carolyn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is to get the compensation there aren't any of the slaves left, sorry but they are all dead. But, why do you not ask chiefs of the tribes that sold the slaves in the first place?
2006-12-28 02:07:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by Get Real 4
·
4⤊
2⤋