2006-12-27 18:20:42 · 9 answers · asked by Ishfaq A 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I believe it is single dimension. That's because science doesn't take into account the whole reason it and the universe exists! GOD! There is so much more to our universe than scientists will ever know, simply because they omit the most important element.....GOD! Sad, but true!
God Bless!
2006-12-27 18:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by nugirl 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I know English may not be your first language (and great effort for asking a question like this in another tongue by the way), but please try and write the question in an unambiguous way so we can all help you by answering the question as best as we can.
If you can imagine it, and study it, then science is there. Static and dynamic areas of science are well funded and researched and have been for several hundreds of years.
Newton's First Law of Motion (1687) states that a body at rest will remain at rest, so science doesn't just deal with "elements in motion". For motion to exist there must have been a static state. It is not possible to have one without the other.
2006-12-28 06:36:45 · answer #2 · answered by Finlay S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science deals with stationary bodies too. But motion and rest is all relative.
2006-12-28 06:56:27 · answer #3 · answered by breezinabout 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually science deals with statics also.
Statics is a whole branch of science that studies why objects are at rest relative to one another.
2006-12-28 03:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by Phillip 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Motion is relative. There is nothing that is stationary. What you may see as stationary, someone else might see as moving. Take the sun, for instance. We say that the sun is stationary with respect to our point of view. However, the sun is moving too, with respect to its neighbors and with respect to the center of the galaxy. Our galaxy may also be viewed as stationary from our point of view. But to other galaxies who may be looking at us, we are moving.
Science studies everything and everything is in motion, relative to something else.
Hope this helps.
2006-12-28 02:31:21 · answer #5 · answered by vidigod 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Enlighten us, O learned one. Where are the elements that are not in motion?
2006-12-28 03:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by Clive 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't that a run-on sentence you know when you write two things at once without separating punctuation it's hard to read when you do that isn't it
2006-12-28 02:34:21 · answer #7 · answered by godlessinaz 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
y do u think so
2006-12-28 02:30:47 · answer #8 · answered by Gurjeet Singh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
err, yes, maybe, no, err, I don't know?
2006-12-28 02:23:28 · answer #9 · answered by Robb the B.D.C. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋