Did the government set explosives in the World Trade Center buildings 1,2 and 7 and take them down on 9/11?

Question

I firmly believe this after doing much research and watching many films. The best one I've seen so far that focuses on demolition is 911 Mysteries. I have watched it and it can't be debunked. Pictures and physics don't lie. Any website I've seen trying to debunk it can't even come close to telling why they collapsed into their own footprint and how steel shot blocks away into neighboring buildings when the towers 1 and 2 came down. Gravity doesn't shoot steel that weighs more than a 767 a block sideways or more. There must be a new truly independent investigation into 9/11. The 9/11 Commission Report was a joke. Here is the 911 Mysteries movie in full for free on Google Video on the link below. You make up your own mind. Prepare to be amazed! Expose the government lies and cover up by speaking out!

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911

Answer 1

I have serious reservations over whether a government would risk attacking its own people in order to justify their war efforts. To me, the weight of the buildings coupled with the melted metal would of led to the sliding motion you witnessed. Had there been a bomb, there would of been a sonicboom blast following it which would of been heard at ground level for several miles, there was not.

Answer 2

The American government had tried to bring down the twin towers for many years. To answer your question, YES! They put implosive devises on several floors of the buildings. Yes I meant implosive because they were not explosives, they were implosive. After the first plane hit , it just shook the building as it crashed into the building. Moments later still nothing. Someone pushed the button to set the implosive off. Then the building started to come down. The same thing that happened to the other building. In 1978 someone parked a car loaded with explosives, in the basement parking lot. The bombs exploded but there were no severe damages to the building. See our government is responsible for a lot of crap that goes on in America. The media is paid off, to the media will say, and do whatever the government wants them to do. The American government are the ones who brainwash the American people on the things that the government wants them to know. That's how the government gets by with so much dirty deeds. They sweep their dirty crap under a rug and then blame it on another country as usual.

Answer 3

such investigations should be transparent by all means and we must find the real factors behind it.whatever might be the political or security reasons such tragic incidents should not be happened any more and people have the full right to know what really happened.it is like a cancerous growth in the human body and a wrong diagnosis or hiding the real factors will lead to a disastrous level in the health of the patient and ultimately the things would be out of control.any biased opinion or twisted data's may lead to wrong decisions and the public is final victims of such mistakes.it is a human nature to make speculations on any incidents which are not properly explained and it is the gov ts duty to give the correct information to avoid such unhealthy developments in the society.it will develop the correct public opinion and the society itself will be more vigilant to defend such matters in the future.wrong information's will help the growth of disastrous forces by misguiding the society.

Answer 4

I strongly agree..i don't know why it was done, but it was, and all those who don't believe it have been brain washed by bush. there is NO way steel would collapse the way it did on 9/11, if it was caused by the fire from the fuel, then why wasn;t there any flames? only smoke! if there was enough fire to take down the whole damn tower it would have spread to the outside of the building as well...and even if it was caused by the weight and impact it wouldnt have crumbled the way it did because of the design and common sense! wake up

Answer 5

Yes I truly believe this! I would also recommend watching 'Loose Change'. It is an excellent documentary as well. Keep trying to get the word out. This crime is responsible for losing our freedoms and for all the wars we are fighting today for absolutely nothing. Government corruption runs deep and includes most upper end politicians, mainstream media and judges. It will take a huge awakening by the American people to stop them. We must speak out!

Answer 6

All these things have been debunked many times over. I'm too tired to give a physics lesson right now & this isn't the proper venue for it. The planes were loaded with fuel which poured into the buildings. The heat of combustion caused high enough temperatures to weaken the steel below what was required to support the buildings. Gravity did the rest.

Answer 7

This video is proof...I am not one to believe something unless there are facts and I can see it..As they say seeing is believing....If you want the truth watch this.....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501

Answer 8

So. You're a wacko. Why are you advertising?

Answer 9

yes they did,look up 'loose change'

Answer 10

911 conspiracy theory is full of holes too although those films can be quite compelling. There are just too much 'cherry picking' of facts, interview excerpts... etc. Here's some example how they twist facts to create dramatic 911 stories.

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. Please read the entire article and learn something called CONTEXT.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense. Did he not want insurance money? His comment is taken way way out of context.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?

And have read 911 comission page by page? Or just listen to those who tell you that they know what's in it?

http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/