lincoln was a republican. the liberals did not fight for blacks or women, most southerners were democrats at that time like algores father who voted against those acts.
furthermore, thats hardly what liberals stand for now. they stand for special rights for gays, women, or any other group they think has the right to get special treatment.
you write like you are six and your conception of liberalism is also infantile
they also hate the United States, they want a weak military, they shred the constitution, they want to increase welfare...heck,....whats right about them??
2006-12-27 17:05:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
7⤋
I amsickened by all the hate-filled tirades here. People spewing out the same old Straw Man image of Liberals and Liberalism. How cna someone's thinking be so aberrant as to actually believe that Liberals hate America and are trying to destroy it? Or maybe thye just hope that some people out here will be stupid enough to swallow their ugly and ridicuklous spin.
Hey, people: The Founding Fathers were Liberals! A conservative resists change, is suspicious of the new and different, and sticks with the tried and true. Well, in 1776 the tried and true was monarchy. There was NO example of a constitutional Democracy to point to. Or a secular government. We got both!
In 1861 the tried and true was slavery-- why, we've always had slavery! It's the natural condition of man! It would be experimentation to give the slaves freedom! LIBERALS were willing to try.
Can anyone be so stupid to think that the people who were Republicans in 1860 would recognize the Party today, and would not recoil in disgust and join the Democrats? Back then it was an idealistic reform party. Liberal! Then after the war it was taken over by Robber Barons. In 1980 it was taken over by Fundamentalists. It is not the Party of Lincoln anymore!
2006-12-27 17:41:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
there's no longer something incorrect with being liberal!! without the american revolution we'd nonetheless be English no longer American! additionally there wasn't Democrat and republican back then. It replaced into the wigs and something else. Now Lincoln in basic terms freed the slaves from the southern states and it replaced into to reason chaos for the union.Whoever reported that"Lincoln freed the slaves...." He did no longer unfastened all the slaves in basic terms those on the southern states. All slaves weren't unfastened for a protracted time. Than Blacks (African human beings) have been in basic terms given an analogous rights ( a minimum of in writing) with the aid of temperance pass. Which by employing the way became into the girls's' pass. there's no longer something, no longer something incorrect in being Liberal or different. for my area i'm a liberal yet this is using the fact i do no longer think of it incredibly is actual for one team to settle on what others could do with their bodies or with their existence. it incredibly is going to possibly be up the guy to make their own judgements. as long as they are no longer harming different persons than it incredibly is their own decision.
2016-10-06 02:43:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I disagree with the way your question/statement was phrased, I disagree with most of the answers even more! I have never read quite as much narrow-minded, "infantile" garbage about liberals--well, at least not since the election.
First of all, I have a problem with any so-called conservative thinkers telling anyone what I, a liberal-thinking American, "stand" for!! None of them know me, so they cannot speak for me.
A liberal is someone who doesn't get stuck in the status-quo rut, someone who is not afraid to try new things, to try to find new solutions for old problems, and someone who doesn't mind if the Federal Government has a little more control over certain things. All Democrats are NOT liberals. All liberals are NOT Democrats. Unfortunately there is not a Liberal Party in this country!
Liberals have done many things to better this country--and certainly do not HATE the US; most of us want to make it better for ALL of its citizens, to make it the land that it was touted to be!
Also, what is "liberal thought" during one decade may be "conservative" by the next decade. It is an ever-changing thing!
And please, again, don't try to speak for me! (For instance: I am an anti-abortion feminist!! [Go figure, eh?])
Before blasting away at liberals, most of you need to do a little homework.
So, to answer your original question: there is NOTHING wrong with liberals. For that matter, there is nothing wrong with conservatives. Just different ways of looking at problems and solutions.
2006-12-27 17:34:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lincoln was a Republican. Most of those supporting slavery were Dems. The civil rights legislation of the 60's was supported by a bipartisan coalition (I'm giving my age away there).
I somehow have trouble believing that YOU fought these battles. Slaves were freed in the 1860's. Women have been voting for more than 85 years. The big civil rights battles were in the 60's. Do you expect anyone to believe that you were politically active for any of these?
2006-12-27 17:09:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Lincoln was a republicon... and I heard the only reason that they freed the slaves was because slaves didn't shop!
If they were freed, they would get paid and shop, providing more for themselves then masters would.
... but that was along time ago.. and things change, even parties.
2006-12-27 17:27:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jesus H. Zeitgeist 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lincoln freed the slaves because he didn't like slavery, and there was a opportunity.
2006-12-27 17:23:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Con Don 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
" Liberals tend to believe that human nature is intrinsically good. Therefore they believe that people who fail or do bad things are not acting out of laziness or wickedness; rather, society put them in this unfortunate position. Since people are innately good, liberals hold that the great conflicts in the world are not the result of good versus evil; rather they arise out of terrible misunderstandings that can be corrected through ongoing conversation and through the mediation of groups like the United Nations. Finally the liberal’s high opinion of human nature leads to the view that if you give people autonomy they will use their freedom well."
http://www.dineshdsouza.com/books/letters-intro.html
That's what's wrong with Liberals. They have an unrealistic view of human nature.
2006-12-27 17:17:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Women voting is a great think I now get two votes.
Ending Slavery also a good think-You know treating other as we would like to be treated.
Lincoln was for the Union if that ment slavery yea and if it ment abolition yea also. He was a republican and wanted to preserve the satus quo-that is to say "Union". Not very liberal
Now I know you didn't bring him up but your liberal freinds always do,-Mother Jones and the like, Jesus Christ was not a liberal but a reactionary of the highest cast-He created the world-Adam and his sons wrecked the place and overthrow their(our) world like he overthrew Sodem and Gomora in earlier ages, and yes he was for women being treated like human beings and yes he died the death of the cross so that the sons of Adam (all humans) could be free from the slavery of sin and death. Total reactionary. Give to the poor.-Your own money Don't steal -my money.
Now comes the time for me to ask what is good about liberalism?
Is Abortion good?-No Liberalism promotes infantacide.
Is Affermative Action good? No it creats unequal laws which divid breathern in opposing factions.
Is a doctor helping his patiant kill him or herself good? No its utterly evil.
Is a weak military good? no its bad it makes us weak and undefendable.
Are high taxes good? No we should let those who do the work keep and dispose of "their money" according to their will that is
right. 10% is an outragus amount to pay in taxes we pay far more than twice that.
Conservitives belive in socialism but the distribution network is not the state but the family.
Should you force me to pay for a public school that teach my child to be a humanist and bases my convictions Hybriss's of all outrages.
Liberalism is stupid and it only got along as it did until the right started speaking out against it.
You tell me what is good about liberlism?
And no you didn't give us the weekend either thank the sabaterian movment for that.
2006-12-27 17:29:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by sean e 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
>>>Why do you think blacks and whites have the same rights?>>>
Charlton Heston was heavily involved in the civil rights movement of the late 50s/early 60s -- well before Hollywood considered such things fashionable. And he's as CONSERVATIVE as they come.
No offense, but what's wrong with liberals is that many of them profess to have a monolopy on things like equality for women and ethnic minorities. They don't.
.
2006-12-27 17:05:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
liberals/Democrats don't believe in giving people autonomy. Liberals/Democrats believe in government telling people what to do as in the government schools. It is Bush and Republicans that wanted to give people school choice with private school vouchers but Democrats/liberals would not have that. Bush and Republicans wanted to let people OWN their social security retirement account. Liberals/Dems and the liberal media stopped Bush. liberals think that individuals are too stupid to handle their own retirement accounts and want government to have the power to do that and just about everything else from redistributing wealth to "protecting" the environment you name it. . this increasing empowerment of government by liberals/Democrats will result in turning the U.S. into the U.S.S.R. , Cuba or N Korea with all the poverty, no freedom and misery. the "liberals" on that other answer by cynthiawee were "classical liberals" who are really conservatives today. Democrats/liberals of today are just socialists or Marxists and always have been since FDR gave us SSI ,medicare and the New Deal which is socialism.
2006-12-27 17:28:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋