2006-12-27 16:26:59 · 5 answers · asked by Matt W 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
I don't seen why they have to choose. Surely, countries can work together on a global scale and help one another out without sacrificing the needs of their people.
2006-12-27 16:29:38 · answer #1 · answered by Amy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't think they should put it ahead of their own nation, but it certainly should be a consideration in whatever decisions they make. Maybe I'm wrong, but in my opinion there is a certain responsibility of a nations leaders to it's own nation first and foremost. I do think we should all do whatever we can to help our neighbors and friends whenever possible. I will always help my family first and I would hope that my nation's leaders would feel the same way.
2006-12-27 16:34:46 · answer #2 · answered by Goddess 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nations always put their concerns first before the global community. So called "leader nations'" such as G7's so called foreign policy, aid, and help are investments in their own interest. People who think otherwise are naive...
2006-12-27 16:46:16 · answer #3 · answered by Stalag 2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no such thing as a "global concern" or "national concern". These are invented by politicians and special-interest groups. For every "global" or "natoinal" concern, there is a group of people for whom it is not a concern, but an opportunity...
2006-12-28 03:58:20 · answer #4 · answered by NC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, as an occasion america has caught its nostril in distant places countries business enterprise for an eternity and has omitted it particularly is very own family members issues right here at abode. I say you may make the assessment of a guy as head of the enjoyed ones places his babies and spouse 2d and his friends first. i understand needless to say it is faulty!!!!!!!!
2016-12-15 09:31:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋