Am I the only Republican here who has looked at the FACTS, and agrees that Bush must be impeached?

Question

1. secretly decided to go to war;
2. decided to deceive and mislead the Congress and the American people with false claims about both weapons of mass destruction and ties between Saddam Hussein and 9-11;
3. secretly diverted $700 million from the War in Afghanistan and started bombing Iraq to provoke a war;
4. agreed to go to the UN only to "legalize" an illegal invasion - and then walked out of the U.N. when inspections worked.

Items 2 and 3 are both impeachable offenses. The Bush Administration's conspiracy to deceive Congress culminated in a fraudulent letter to Congress on March 18, 2003, claiming continued U.N. inspections would endanger the national security of the United States.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/611

This fraud violated the federal anti-conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, which makes it a felony "to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose..."; and The False Statements Accountability Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which makes it a felony to issue knowingly and willfully false statements to the United States Congress.

President Bush did not declare war until March 2003. Congress did not authorize military action until October 11, 2002. But Bush began an air war six weeks before that authorization and increased "spikes of activity" five months before. This means that additional communications to Congress from the President, claiming that he had not yet begun the war, may be felonious, and that Bush violated the Constitutional requirement that Congress authorize any war.

These criminal actions constitute High Crimes under Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution: "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

fly
do I take that for a yes?

tinker thinker
Iwish people like you and those like you would quit calling yourselves republicans,all of you are bushites plain and simple.

cynthiatw...
you are not a Republican, you are a Bushite

ruth
are you a bushite or a Republican?

Answer 1

yes, you probalby are the only Republican who has done their research, judging by some of the republicans on here and the ones I meet in real life.

Thank you sir for being a true American and using your freedom of thought for intelligent conversation. I salute you.

Answer 2

i'm no longer a Republican, yet i could could think of helping impeachment could be good for the Republican social gathering to re-set up credibility with the ordinary public. The Republican social gathering has to do each thing it may to distance itself from the thinking that brought about Iraq -- a conflict that would o.k. bypass down by using fact the biggest strategic blunder interior the historic past people distant places coverage. WIth all of the gutting of our way of existence that has accompanied this conflict and President, there's a lot to question on that's consistent with conservative thinking and the rule of thumb of regulation. undergo in suggestions that eloquent speech Henry Hyde made, with reference to the rulw of regulation, that led in part to Clinton's impeachment? i think of if Republicans went decrease back and re-study that speech they could that impeachment is a patriotic pass.

Answer 3

Personally I agree that Bush should be impeached. The question is WHY hasn't he been. No President has the right to put any American in harms way invading another country for NO reason. People will say it's because of 9/11. WRONG! What/ how did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11? Excuse me but I thought it was Osama BinLaden. So why are 95% of our resources in Iraq and NOT in Afghanistan trying to capture the real person behind 9/11? Don't get me started on this shiiit! We as American have been lied to by our own government and no one gives a shiit!

Answer 4

I'm not a Republican and neither are you.

Furthermore, you are either trying to purposely mislead ignorant people or you are a dupe.

Work harder on getting your information from reliable sources and try to push your POLITICS out again -- only this time be more honest at least with yourself. If there were ANY grounds for impeachment, the Democrats and the elite media would have already pushed that agenda through -- duh.

Think about it!

Answer 5

That's a tricky question.

Answer 6

Joe, I salute you. I'm an Independent, but you're the first Republican I've encountered on here who is willing to admit that Bush is a disaster. Kudos to you for actually being a Republican and not just a Bush parrot.

EDIT: Okay Joe, is it true? Are all the Repubs on here accusing you of being a liberal or a poser right? Or are they just horrified to find one of the many Republicans who actually acknowledges reality? Inquiring minds want to know the truth ;).

Answer 7

Hilarious that as soon as you disagree with Bush your a liberal. I guess that makes Pat Buchanan and Tucker Carlson liberal. I just think sensible people republican and democrat are waking up to the fact that this guy is bad for the country

Answer 8

Repuglicans, don't sound like that, you have the ability to think. Repuglicans can't think, all they know is what Rush Limbaugh tells them to think. You would not last very long in congress if you were elected as they would get rid of you because you have the ability to think. Thinking can difitely get a repuglican in trouble. In answer to your question, Yes.

Answer 9

The only problem I have with bush is the lack of protection on our borders.


Who do you think you are fooling. You are not a Republican, you're a liberal.

Answer 10

Joe, your post is right on the money. But don't expect to hear too many other republicans agreeing with you. Remember, facts are like kryptonite to a republican.