A person can tell by the soles of the feet whether or not certain diseases or ailments exist in the body. The eyes are said to be the window to the sole. Diifferent parts of the body seem to show different signs or symptoms. Do the foot size really reflect the size of a man's penis? Has it been scientifically tested?
2006-12-27 15:37:47 · 24 answers · asked by Changed 3 in Health ➔ Men's Health
i dont wanna know...
2006-12-27 15:39:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no but it is said that men acted there shoes size not there age half the time..
medically speaking the size of a bloke tackal useually depends on the size they grow up too be.for example a small bloke bcause of his size would have small ball so naturally a big bloke would have big balls.but the simple fact is at the end of the day big or small a blokes balls are only there for one thing too holdsperm it doesnt matter what size it is they all work the same way unless u have something wrong with you parts down below.. then u might come across problems like a low sperm count unable too have kids not being able too become aroused things like that... but most men whatever the differences in there sizes things still work down there and thats what most woman are interested in...
2006-12-27 16:11:54 · answer #2 · answered by mitch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know I wear a size 16 and my penis is 7.75 inches long. The so called formula for figuring out a mans penis size by shoe size is SHOE SIZE DIVIDED BY 2. I wear a 16 so 16/2=8
It is only 0.25" (1/4) off from actual size. You decide.
2006-12-27 15:42:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it has and no it isn;t. There is no correlation between the size of a body part and a man's penis. My roommate and I can prove that since we both wear exactly the same size shoes but are definitely not the same size when it comes to penis length or girth. I'll leave ti to you to find out which one is which - hehe.
2006-12-27 15:44:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scientists have done extensive studies on this, and there's no correlation. I don't feel like digging up the research right now, but Wikipedia has a thorough article on penis size and the myths surrounding it, including penis size vs. race.
2006-12-27 15:45:26 · answer #5 · answered by sous_lepontmirabeau 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The size of a male's genitals has nothing to do with his shoe size. It is nothing but speculation and hasn't been scientifically proven.
2006-12-27 17:06:47 · answer #6 · answered by ramon20041986 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm no scientist, but I don't think so, as I'm a size 11 shoe, and completely average in the... well... you know...
I think it may just be that tall people have larger feet and "garbage" because of their body proportion.
Thats my story and excuse, and I'm sticking to it.
2006-12-27 16:13:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's just a myth buddy, Im a size foot and just average in the package, know what Im sayin ?
2006-12-27 16:28:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no just a myth, big feet have nothing to do with the size of penis
2006-12-27 16:17:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely not
u know how northern European males are known to have big... package down there?
well, back in high school i used to know this second generation full-blooded Swedish guy who was very tall over 6 ft. and had big foot.
when i saw him naked...
his penis was smaller than my younger brother's (age 10)
which isn't bad but i was quite surprised
plus the Swedish guy wasn't even circumcised...
which i thought was kinda odd but once i foudn out that it's not necessary, it was okay...
2006-12-27 15:55:28 · answer #10 · answered by hellothere 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. I've been out with guys that had big feet and a small penis and vice-versa. One has NOTHING to do with the other!
2006-12-27 15:43:22 · answer #11 · answered by Terri R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋