Tell about the money trail to 9/11 or will he try and count on deplomacy by France and Germany to spare his neck
2006-12-27 15:33:23 · 13 answers · asked by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was not on trial for weapons or supporting 9/11.
He was found guilty of mass murdering his own people.
He did kill many of his own people with weapons of mass destruction even if the US & its allies did not find any after ousting him from power.
If you care to be honest with yourself, here is an excellent article about Iraq's ties to al Qaeda and other world terrorists before 9/11. WARNING it is written at a level of English greater than the 7th grade level so you Time, Newsweek & USA Today readers may need to get out a dictionary.
http://www.hillsdale.edu/imprimis/
Keep searching for the truth ... don't believe the garbage that the elite media and people trying to get elected dish out to the masses.
2006-12-27 17:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by Figure it out! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The money trail leads to Saudis, not Iraq. Saddam didn't have a damn thing to do with 9/11, and the only WMDs found were 20+ year old duds(that we and the Brits sold them) left over from their war with Iran in the 80s. Parroting Rovian propaganda doesn't convince people of your infallibility, kid. Grow up :)
2006-12-27 23:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. He had nothing to do with either 9/11 or did he have WMD when we invaded. And it's an Iraqi court. Who is he gonna make a deal with?
2006-12-28 00:19:40 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a good question. When they took his picture after being caught he was a scared old man until he got cleaned up and saw the camera. There is a chance he might squeal and tell what he was shipping into Syria on all of those trucks while Bush was at the U.N. asking them for help .
2006-12-27 23:38:32 · answer #4 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
how would admitting to weapons and his support of 9/11 save his life?? did i miss something?
2006-12-27 23:37:13 · answer #5 · answered by navdeepkaur 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He didnt support 911. So get over it. Even Bush admits Saddam had nothing to do with 911.
2006-12-27 23:38:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He doesn't have to make any deals. His sentence still has to be ratified by the prez and 2 VPs, one of which is a Suni.
And no, it wasn't a fair trial.
2006-12-27 23:46:45 · answer #7 · answered by luosechi 駱士基 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He may try but I dont think that it will do him no good. I think that the court has made its decision and they will stand by it. I only hope that there is not too much violence when all this happens.
2006-12-27 23:38:05 · answer #8 · answered by karen v 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is to late to make a deal he has already been charged and convicted!
The only deal he will be making is with the devil how he will spend eternity!.....Smile
2006-12-27 23:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by 2u-sister 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are you still counting on the weapons of mass destruction to justify the invasion in Iraq??? haven't you heard: Bush has changed his reasoning on invading Iraq.... so it's all good now!!!!!!!
before we kill Saddam..... i would like to hear the pros and cons of having him put to death!!!!! because i wonder if killing him isn't going to start WW-III!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-27 23:39:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋