that cigarettes were neither addicted nor harmful, were they paid off by the tobacco industry or were they really that stupid?
2006-12-27 14:21:11 · 7 answers · asked by Edward 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
paid off.
2006-12-27 14:45:32 · answer #1 · answered by mumtaz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was a bit humored by the tobacco wars.
Now the medical community is saying tobacco prevents Alzheimer's. With the aging baby boomers will they flip flop and suggest we start smoking again,
Go big Red Go
2006-12-27 22:38:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Means to an end: save tobacco companies, keep raking in the money from tobacco taxes.
2006-12-27 22:35:29 · answer #3 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With enough money you can find an expert opinion to fit any need. There is no way any professional could be that stupid..
2006-12-27 22:25:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you can find a few scientists to say that there's no such thing as global warming, I'm sure there must be a few doctors who think smoking is no big deal.
2006-12-27 22:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
They are just like the doctors that said that babies couldnt feel their heads being crushed during an abortion.
2006-12-27 22:23:29 · answer #6 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I never met them.
2006-12-27 22:23:38 · answer #7 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋