I rekon Zimbabwe would give England a run for their money!!
2006-12-27 14:20:57 · 9 answers · asked by I'm not a Gypsy!! 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
In respect to the above reply, Outer Mongolia seconds would give England and Zimbabwe combined a good run for their money.
2006-12-27 14:42:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bangladesh and Zimbabwe might want to play 1st type 3 or 4 days experience all the three hundred and sixty 5 days round and extra try tournament experience antagonistic to mature aspects interior the international like Australia, England, Sri Lanka, South Africa, India, Pakistan, West Indies and New Zealand, then Bangladesh and Zimbabwe takes to be adequate to continuously global try cricket.
2016-12-01 06:04:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are living in a dream land. Right now Zimbabwe has the weakest team in the international cricket. England is perhaps third following Australia and South Africa.
2006-12-27 15:00:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's Zimbabwe.
2006-12-27 17:03:34 · answer #4 · answered by rahul m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Zimbabwe, the only sport the english are good at is drinking
2006-12-27 15:59:06 · answer #5 · answered by NONAME 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm.. current england performance in australia and seeing that zimbabwe won their odi series against bangladesh last year.. im going to Zim.
2006-12-27 14:46:32 · answer #6 · answered by tino67 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irrespective of their performance against Australia, England is far better side than Zimbawe.
2006-12-27 14:26:40 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in fact england could lose
2006-12-27 17:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
england is the better team. why should eraise this type of questions?
2006-12-27 15:24:43 · answer #9 · answered by bachi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋