The venice's airport is called Marco Polo and it's located in Tessera near the ss14 (state road) at about 8 miles north of the city
by train, from Roma Termini Station to Venezia-Mestre it takes from 4h30 up to 5h50 depending on which train you'll take and I think it will cost around 50 euros
anyway for further infos you can check on http://www.trenitaliaplus.com/index.html
hoping will be useful
2006-12-27 17:49:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by ₪djanma₪ [a man in the maze] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Venice and Rome both have two airports… but it is more hassle then the train. The airports are outside the cities. The train station is pretty close to the centre and if you’ll come to the airport you’ll most probably have to take a train or a taxi there anyway…
It’s about 5 hours while you sit comfortable, and watch the beautiful landscapes of Italy. There are no other costs and time spending like taxis or other trains to the airports. There are many trains during daytime so you don’t really need to book ahead.
Here is the link: http://www.trenitalia.com
2006-12-30 05:35:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've made that trip before & been to Venice several times. No doubt about it, no question, the train is best. None of the airport hassles. The view is great out the window. And in both cases the train stations are in center city so you don't have the hassle of having to get from airport to city center. This is very important, believe me. Rome airport is VERY far from city center, don't take taxi unless you want to pay way over 100 euros; take the train or bus from airport to city center. Venice airport isn't too far from town but still you're looking at 35+ euro cab fare. Take train & avoid that hassle (and all the other utter hassles of flying these days).
2006-12-28 06:45:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Babyface 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are distinctive selections, yet once you are going to work out Rome and Venice, how would desire to you pass up Florence on the way between the different 2? Florence has magnificent paintings and shape. See Michelangelo's David interior the Accademia gallery and flow to the galleries of the Uffizi and Pitti Palace between the different locations. Chruches like the Duomo, Santa Croce and Santa Maria Novella are purely a start up. Plus some very good Tuscan foodstuff. attempt the Ribollita, Cinghiale or Fiorentina once you're there. in case you have have been given some days, you may easily get out into the Tuscan nation-state for a outing. Pisa/Lucca is a short prepare holiday from Florence. yet another threat could be to flow up the coast to Cinque Terre on the thank you to Venice. the paths between the cities have some superb ecosystem looking out over the Gulf and the cities themselves are scenic, if touristy.
2016-12-11 17:14:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is airport in Venice. You can find cheap flights from Rome to Venice. Try MYAIR company, or Wizz Air, Or Sky Europe!
2006-12-28 02:33:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by sandi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The train would be the cheapest way to get from rome to venice also that way you pass threw other places and you canmaybe stop off and see other things. If you dont want to see othr things they have a speed train that takes about 2hrs to 3hrs to get to venice.
2006-12-28 08:47:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by dimplez0804 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey take the train. (www.trenitalia.com) venice has 2 airports - marcopolo and trevisio.
they are a good one hour's journey from main venezia.
the train takes you straight into venice.
also on the train try to avoid the eurostar trains , there are cheaper but slower trains (extra hour for journey, will save you 20-30 euros)
2006-12-28 10:09:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by faradayin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try this website http://www.eurail.com/. The train would be your best bet....Small airlines in Italy are www.ryanair.com....www.easyjet.com
2006-12-27 13:45:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by mbronerlpn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Train would be better, and much easier. Take it overnight so you you don't miss a day of sightseeing.
2006-12-27 15:27:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by nenadcal 3
·
0⤊
0⤋