No.
The number of people this conspiracy would have to include make it impossible to be reality. Also, the fact that there is no credible evidence or argument to support this conspiracy theory should be a good indication of how valid it is.
2006-12-27 10:42:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They were warned of terrorist attacks on the USA but no one knew where. After 9/11 happening it became a push by the PNAC to create a war in Iraq by plotting a bunch of lies to get the Bush Administration to declare war on Iraq. The PNAC and their objective is to place American Armed Forces bases around the World and to play Global Dictator. They want the oil plus to have Armed Forces bases all around the world.
Joke is on them if Congress stops Bush, the gig is up. Some of you should well to be advised that the PNAC with the likes of **** Cheney, Karl Rove, Jeb Bush, Richard Perle and William Kristol are some of deviants behind the PNAC. They could give a darn about the average American as they are there to look after the interests of the rich who are capitalizing off the War in Iraq.
2006-12-27 20:02:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This scenario is very similar to the one blaming FDR for bombing Pearl Harbor. Did the US know in advance that the 9/11 attacks would happen and do nothing to stop it so they could justify a war with Iraq?
No.
What the Bush administration DID know (as was revealed in the senate hearings) was that there was ample evidence that a surprise attack was in the works ... and the Bush administration neglected to consider the severity of the threat.
THAT is scandalous enough without having to buy into any stupid conspiracy theory.
2006-12-27 19:29:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Please remember that our government is a HUGE entity and "seperate" moving parts. We had a lot of clues provided through the 90's that Al Quaeda were indeed planning something, but through miscommunication, bad intellegence reports and the like from several different agencies and of course the NON sharing of vital information , led to a lax in security that helped them commit the events on 9/11
No, there were no one warned to not fly on 911. IN fact several important people were on flights on 911 and up to 911
Sandy berger is sadly misinformed and he was also fIRED from his job (so he has a gripe against our government. YOU will not get a non-biased answer from him).
as for an excuse. NO, 911 wasn't the reason why we went to war with IRAQ and anyone who claims this is not informed.
2006-12-27 19:06:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by arus.geo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sometimes I think the 9/11 theories are one way of trying to deal with the fact that a plan as well thought out and executed (as it was deadly and despicable) was able to happen to us.
Once Al-Qaeda found the 4 "death pilots" who were willing and able to execute such a long-term operation (not to mention sacrifice themselves), 9/11 was a done deal. I still think the 15 "non-pilot' hijackers were duped, even Bin-Laden said so.
EVERYONE got burned. CIA, FBI, even INS actually sent visa-extensions to 2 of the hijackers 6 months after the attack.
As for Mossad agents dancing around in Brooklyn that day, I have no friggin clue.
Oh well, if that's what someone said, why would he lie?
2006-12-27 19:02:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
We know from the hearings that they knew that bin laden was planning to use planes as weapons against the US. They admitted they didn't do anything to prevent that, and clearly they didn't. So, if we know that much, I can't imagine what's classified still. I do not think they planned it (they clearly haven't been able to plan anything), but they also didn't act on what they knew, I think they were complicit and/or stupid.
2006-12-27 19:07:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Angry Daisy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sandy Berger thinks so. You should contact him.
He stole & destroyed classified documents that he thought would implicate Clinton in 9/11.
Please contact him immediately and give him any evidence you have.
You can make millions of dollars.
Just don't end up like Vince Foster.
Contact Sandy. He's looking for you.
2006-12-27 18:45:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sounds like yet another lame conspiracy theory.
Hint: If the government cannot keep legitimate national secrets under wraps - how can you expect them to keep a conspiracy this size under wraps?
2006-12-27 18:57:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The intelligence agencies knew that AlQuaeda was up to something but weren't sure about the details. Bush was on vacation so he didn't take any action.
2006-12-27 18:55:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Why would our government not act to prevent the killing of thousands of innocent Americans? Conspiracy theories are fun, but never pan out in the end.
2006-12-27 18:42:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by mvsopen 3
·
3⤊
2⤋