The landings were staged on a special set constructed on the moon. This was done for greater realism.
The landings won;t be "revealed" as lies because they weren't. Who besides NASA could possibly have had camera's up there to record it?
Does anyone really think that our government could possibly keep something like this a secret for almost 4 decades?
2006-12-27 09:55:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
18⤊
2⤋
Heh. Yeah, the situation seems strange. I haven't seen such nice-looking photographs from space since about the time of the moon landing.
And the photographs couldn't be classified as a "conspiracy" even if invented by the government. We weren't conspiring against anyone. The only thing such an invented achievement would have been good for is to make it look like we beat the Russians in the race to space. You know, kind of like the race to the nuclear bomb (the actual utilization of which in Japan was completely unnecessary).
2006-12-27 17:55:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't listen to all these negative answers Jake. This is a very good question. Answer this....How come we sent so many people to the moon 40 years ago and now we can't even keep a space shuttle in "low" earth orbit without killing eveyone on board? And why is it Nasa's new goal to try and land another man on the moon in the year 2020?
2006-12-27 18:20:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Before you continue to make a fool out of yourself, you should read "First Man", Neil Armstrong's autobiography. Also, why don't you go to Cocoa Beach, Huntsville, and Houston, and start talking about your conspiracy beliefs, and see how long it takes to get the crap beaten out of you by the thousands of folks who have dedicated their lives to the space program, and tell them that they have all been duped. After all, you must be an expert on the space program, evidently self-appointed.
2006-12-27 17:52:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by hbsizzwell 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Talk about beating a dead horse! With all the travesties going on in the world today, couldn't you find a more current issue to obsess about?
2006-12-27 17:57:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by arkiemom 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Another Oliver Stone, conspiracys keep you bunch going don't they.
2006-12-27 17:47:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by rdyjoe 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Go crawl back under the rock from which you came!!! Dont you have anything more relevent to offer us???
2006-12-27 17:50:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr Bellows 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Is this even an important discussion right now?
2006-12-27 17:48:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by mrlebowski99 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
with people like you we should for sure continue to invest in Conspiracy! http://www.trendio.com/word.php?wordid=2221&language=en
2006-12-27 18:04:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by markuzzz2 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Show us proof it is!
2006-12-27 17:52:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by acid0philus 2
·
1⤊
2⤋