2006-12-27 09:21:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
His private thing did not cause the nation to sacrifice 3000 soldiers, 25,0000 wounded, and a total of 600,000 dead. Bush lied every single day, every single sentence when talking about Iraq war. There are documented eveidence. Since this is a so called war time, Bush is getting away with murder. Anybody who doesn't see this erosion of the prestige of the US presidency, thinks that the world events are made up of electronic games! To you folks, get ready to salute the Chinese and the Indian flags. Arrogance has its limits. The world is advancing and we are being taken advantage of by anti-american interests.
2006-12-27 09:33:14 · update #1
Finally - a question worth answering - Bush ran for reelection claiming the need for bringing back the need for integrity in the white house - rightly so. Has become the most prolific liar since Richard Nixon.
2006-12-27 09:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by deadstroak 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Is this a question alledging something? Or, are you speaking as a person who is an authority on what is and isn't? The US Congress, with a VERY small minority feeling to the contrary (Special note here: None of the current Democrats currently running for President, who were elected members of Congress at the time, voted against the War, including John Kerry, who couldn't keep his story right about whether he voted for the War or not. Good thing for the Archives of the US Congress and C-SPAN!), voted to give Bush carte blanche for the War. Now, WHO is the guilty party?
2006-12-27 09:48:04 · answer #2 · answered by acid0philus 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush was given intelligence from international sources regarding Saddam having WMD. After being reviewed by Congress they (congress) authorized the war on Iraq. Many of your democrat congressional representatives agreed that Saddam had crossed the UN one to many times and sanctioned the war. Get off the Bush bashing!!!
2006-12-27 09:35:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
People still like Clinton. He was wrong for being untruthful about Monica. Still, he would have done far better if he had simply refused to answer ANY questions about his PRIVATE life. He was the president. He had the power to answer.or not to answer...He chose the former. Bad move.
Bush lied about the reasons he went to war. But...what is done is done. Presidents lie. Even George Washington.
2006-12-27 09:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is not true and Bush is open to impeachment and actions brought against him in the World Court! Maybe that is why he bought 100,000 acres in Peru!
The problem is, the congress are a bunch of wimps, as is the Senate! They didn't fail to go after Clinton though!
There has never been a president impeached in the US, and that includes Clinton as he won his trial before the House!
Hey Call me, Bush lied so many times he can't even keep them straight, and I would like to see your proof that Clinton attacked anyone. I think you are thinking of that great Republican, Clarence Thomas, who's whole statements under oath before the US Senate were unadulterated lies!
2006-12-27 09:31:12 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
LOL!
Clinton lied about a private "thing" - no pun intended, I am sure!
President Clinton lied under oath about his involvement with Monica Lewinsky in an attempt to avoid prosecution for sexual harassment of Paula Jones when he was Governor of Arkansas.
He used his position and power as President to try and stop that investigation. Yes, it was definitely impeachable!
2006-12-27 09:23:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Right.
And if Bush were to face crimes he HAS committed, you think he would be above lying under oath? Certainly not. He's lied so many times about so many things, I seriously doubt he'd be able to distinguish the truth from the lies he's known to have quoted over the last 6 years.
2006-12-27 11:37:15 · answer #7 · answered by Schona 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Lying under oath is a felony. Relying on bad intel isn't. Clinton lied under oath. Bush relied on bad intel. THAT is the difference.
2006-12-27 10:09:59 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
FDR lied to get us into WW 11.
Wilson lied to get us into WW 1.
So what?
Bill Clinton was a WAR CRIMINAL by being a Draft-Dodger.
(Both Ford & Carter saved Clinton from going to prison. Shame on both of them.)
2006-12-27 09:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you. Not everyone is hip to the cold hard facts that
9-11 was an inside job.
When Clinton lied under oath, yes, it was wrong. But grounds for impeachment? Not a chance.
I just wish these Bush supporters would open their eyes, and realize what is actually going on.
2006-12-27 09:29:27 · answer #10 · answered by Seven Costanza 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋