Do you feel that US's healthcare system is flawed?

Question

If you do, why? If you don't, why?

Answer 1

It is not just flawed it is FUBAR.I have friends from Denmark and Lithuania and they are baffled how our healthcare system is set up.Everyone over there is cared for.Health care should be a basic human right in our day and age,not only for those who can afford it.one suggestion I heard of the other day was to let people have the option of buying into a medicare insurance plan.In other words make medicare a competitor of the health insurance companies.That would create some competition because private health insurers have much higher administative costs than does medicare(believe it or not!) Half of the people on welfare abuse it.They could get off their lazy a.s.s.e.s. and work like the rest of us and we could use that savings to help get an affordable health insurance plan for those of us who need it.There are way too many government handouts for the lazy.We should cut those out and focus on creating a medicare insurance option for people.I am not saying put the health insurance companies out of business but give people an option.Maybe even have an income cutoff amount???

Answer 2

The US health care system is flawed because it attempts to establish a socialism-based delivery system in a capitalism-based payment system. As a result, it does a poor job of both.

People cannot get care at a reasonable price and the whole thing still costs too much at a national level. The current donut-hole pharmacy subsidy is an example.

Answer 3

It is definitely flawed: too much government involvement. We need to get rid of Medicare and Medicaid, and in the cases of truly needy people, if the government has to help at all--which it should not--give money directly to the beneficiary. Beneficiaries will choose to spend it on other items, but that is their right.

For those that want the government to provide health care: what we will get is less product/service at a much higher cost and lower quality. Look at other nations--Canada, Sweden, Great Britain--these are not the ideal.

For those who use longevity and infant mortality as indicators--they are not actually helpful in comparing health care between countries. For those who cite the ___ million "without health care": 1. they are not without health care, they are without health insurance; 2. the number overstates the problem--many of these are choosing not to be insured, many are uninsured only temporarily.

Answer 4

Yes, it is by the very nature that there are more than 40 million uninusred. Futhermore, we are the highest spender by far and yet, measured by either longevity or infant mortality, we are not even in top three amongst developed nations!
It is flawed because the "system" as a whole, incentivize health care providers not on the basis of results, i.e. health of patient, but on the basis of procedures done. In short, the system is rewarding providers not on prevention, but on people getting sick!
Lastly, if one looks into hospital operations, they are required by government to provide care whether a person is insured or not. Statistics has it such that the paying patient (via insurance payment) is funding these uninsured with significant premium, to the tune of 25%.

Answer 5

no restrictions on private insurance as well as not strict enough on frivolous and or basic medical malpractice lawsuits.

who ever says its the medical industry and doctors you are so mistaken. The AMA is and has been fighting for some oversight of medical insurance for years and it has been denied time and time again. The insurance companies take money out of both parties pockets coupled with threats of lawsuits makes the doctors make less money and the private citizens pay more. this is why doctors are leaving their practices in droves already coupled with the idea that people are pushing for national healthcare which makes it even worse for the doctors and will push more out of the business.

Answer 6

Ummm...you guys don't have a healthcare "system" per se. What exists is very spotty and depends on your own luck (or lack of luck) vis-a-vis your employer (healthcare is considered a "benefit") . There are many reports issued by credible bodies/institions who have studied this - findings are easy enough to obtain online. Their overwhelming consensus: statistically, the US spends more money on healthcare per indivdual than an other (developed) country and the delivery of this healthcare is the least effective.

Answer 7

we are saying that they do no longer choose for reform by using fact they're appearing like they do no longer choose for reform. A city corridor assembly in Missouri immediately made that very sparkling. The Republicans extra greater desirable than one hundred parts to a bill on an identical time as Democrats extra under one hundred. while the bill replaced into looking like it replaced into frequently Republican supported, all of them voted against it. It replaced into the very bill that they wrote maximum folk of. would not that inform you something? It tells me a lot. i'm specific Democrats do the comparable ingredient with different expenses. as a effect it somewhat is the Republicans who're in charge. Tort reform is one in each of those small ingredient of the subject easily. There are people who sue just to sue yet they're the minority. There are much greater issues that Tort. insurance companies pay docs under they could. docs usually in basic terms acquire 80 5% of their expenses in the event that they bill an insurance business employer. insurance companies be sure what assessments can and can't be carried out, no longer docs. insurance companies be sure which drugs would be prescribed via putting exorbitant costs on drugs they do no longer choose for to conceal in the event that they conceal them in any respect. sufferers are no longer being proactive of their well being and that's additionally driving up expenses. do no longer think of that complaints are even close to to the common subject. they're surely taking place and yet our costs are nevertheless increasing.

Answer 8

It really is not a health care system anymore. It is a for profit care system. The goal of the industry is to gain as mush profit as possible with the least amount of care provided. HMOS do this. The health care industry are the new robber barons of this century and need considerable government oversight to maintain the health and safety of the people (without loosing our savings and homes to pay for it).

Answer 9

Flawed is not even a good word to use. Corrupt is more like it. If a sick person cannot get treated without money, there is something seriously wrong. The drug companies keep everything very expensive. The drug companies have deals with lawmakers and they overall control health care.

It is funny that other countries can give health care to their people for free, but America cannot.

I was on vacation in Scandinavia and my wife became sick which required hospitalization for 4 days. When she was discharged, they did not charge us a dime. Why? Because of socialized medicine. It is similar to that of Canada. It does not make the country communist, actually they have a monarchy. Their King walks around without armed guards and as for taxes, if found out it is similar to being in the United States. About 38% of your paycheck goes towards taxes. When is the last time you added up what we pay for Federal and State taxes. Oh, and do not forget all those misc fees we have.

America may be the best country in the world, but it does not mean we cannot learn something different from others.

Answer 10

It's not flawed. It's broke.

Universal health-care allows every man, woman and child easy access to good health-care.

Universal health-care isn't perfect. For instance you usually have to wait a while for elective (non-emergency) surgery. But on balance, there's no contest at all.

The 'ONLY' people that the U.S. health care system benefits are the very rich... perhaps the top 5-8% of the population. Anyone who doesn't fit into that category, in the U.S., receives health care that's about on par with Universal health care... and they pay through the nose for it. And every time they use it, their premiums go up.

30 million Americans have no health-care coverage at all, and many more millions are drastically under-insured. Under universal health care, everyone gets as much coverage as they require.

There's a good reason that almost all modern countries, except for the U.S., have gone to Universal Health care. And the only reason that the U.S. hasn't is because it's the cash cow for Pharmeutical companies and the medical industry.

Do you know how much more you pay for the exact same medicines and services in the U.S. than countries with Universal health care pay? Your drugs are way more expensive... and they're the same drugs that are used in Canada or Swedan or any other country with UHC. Same with almost all medical services. The U.S. system costs way more to run, and it provides less.

Change it. You're getting used and abused for profit.