after getting a college degree, a career congressman achieving minority leader of the House of Representatives before being chosen by Nixon as Vice President after Spiro Agnew was removed for his corruption in Maryland government as Governor and then Nixon was found to be guilty in Watergate, whereupon he pardonned him for that to spare the country a lot of litigation over that. But what about signing the Privacy Act of 1974 giving preference from that time forward to that status quo creeds of this country at that time even to this date, actually causing discrimination in religion, something it was supposed to stop. It allowed discrimination by reducing access to statistical data that would make claiming minoity religious status possible! So by keeping that data our of the loop, this act made it possible for traditional fundamentalists Christian families to control us more. Was that a fair act to do that or do you think that that is the only righteous way to control morals today?
2006-12-27
09:17:34
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics