If Congress had any REAL case against him, wouldn't he have been on trial for at least as long as everyone, outside of the government, has been whining for him to be?
2006-12-27 08:59:26 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
There is nothing to impeach him for. The Democrats know that.
The Democrats were just trolling for ignorant & and gullible people to vote for them.
It worked.
But the Democrats lied to their voters.
(But the Democrat voters aren't smart enough to ever figure it out.)
2006-12-27 09:19:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, first of all, Bush had a majority of his party in both houses of Congress. Considering he stopped any serious investigation into the events of 9/11 which could have found evidence because of that majority, no effort could get off the ground.
There has to be real evidence to win a vote for Impeachment to begin with. Impeachment itself is futile if there is not enough evidence to convict. But the evidence is being accumulated. Whether it will be compelling enough to go ahead with Impeachment & trial is anyone's guess right now.
Another consideration. If Bush is impeached & convicted (meaning simply removed from office), Dick Cheney would become President. Even most neo cons don't want that. We need patience, but we still need to get the ball rolling.
Of the 11 9/11 Commission members, 8 call for re opening a truly independent inquiry. Check out the link below for details & decide what you will do next.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
2006-12-27 09:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by bob h 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
in the previous 2004, i could have reported specific. yet at this ingredient, i think of the subject is the yank public. we could desire to clever up. He began the conflict in Iraq in the previous 2004. In defiance of just about each and every of the international. Denied that international warming exists, and lower back and lower back violated separation of church and state. no longer something he's finished interior the final 3 years has been any worse than what he did over his first 4 years in place of work, this is in fact basically persevering with what's been going on. And he grew to become into re-elected. on condition that he hasn't particularly executed something that we did no longer re-decide for him for, no, i do no longer think of it may be honest to question him. We knew what we've been in for, and we've been stupid adequate to maintain him in place of work. we will ought to holiday it out for some 12 months and a 0.5, and then attempt to restoration the wear and tear...with any luck. Kevin B - Are you insanely stupid? I agree that we will no longer impeach him, yet to spout that mindless "have you ever forgotten" bullshit...and do you reside interior the 12 months 19-thirty f*cking 5?! understanding some hurricane isn't comparable to making plans it. making plans this is not available...yet we do have this ingredient referred to as doppler radar...you're able to nicely know approximately it in the past.
2016-11-23 20:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by woolf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that at some point in George W. Bush's term everyone has questioned this. I think that there is no solid eveidence against him and Maybe him going into office wasn't a good idea to start with...or maybe people thought it was going to be better then it is. I cant tell you why Nothing has been done about it other then the people who seem to really bothered by it are the ones like us on Yahoo...Instead of the phone to the white house.
2006-12-27 09:08:23 · answer #4 · answered by Just Jak 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are they going to impeach him for, being terribly unpopular?
The people who wish to see this president impeached are the same people who were screaming like babies because John Kerry didn't win.
In fact, I just read some of the BS on the impeachbush website-what a crock.
2006-12-27 09:21:09 · answer #5 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because they can't impeach Bush without bringing down the house on their own heads.
2006-12-27 09:12:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the Congress wanted to impeach someone, they have plenty of candidates, in Congress! President Bush has committed no crimes!
2006-12-27 09:13:09 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The House brings charges of impeachment, and it is under Republican control until next month.
2006-12-27 17:07:15 · answer #8 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
110th Congress take office Jan. 5th at the crack-of-dawn.
Do you think that Republican congressmen are smart enough to bring up Impeachment and save a little face--Yeah right!! Enjoy these last few days of control while they last.
Tune in to the Jon Elliot show tonight for the 14 reasons Bush should be impeached. Bad Boy Bad Boy--Whatcha gonna do..
2006-12-27 09:07:55 · answer #9 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Because there are a bunch of idiots out there that think he should be impeached just because they don't like him.
2006-12-27 13:19:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋