2006-12-27 08:39:57 · 22 answers · asked by Maninblack 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No
2006-12-27 08:44:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Saddam is far from innocent. It is strange, however, that there have been more deaths in Iraq since we invaded than during Saddam's entire reign. Though that is no excuse for Saddam, it makes someone else look equally guilty.
2006-12-27 08:49:30 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
But I am skeptical of many of the charges levied against him.
Much was pumped up by the liberal media. eg Dead Kurds went from 5000 to 100.
The problems I have do not apply to Iraqi law. like expost facto. Iraq has no such laws.
The guy was a weasel and if you live by the sword than expect to die by the sword.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-27 08:47:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not believe he did anything any other person would not have done, if he/she were in his place. Using force to suppress rebellion against the ruling govt is neither uncommon nor considered illegal. There are plenty of examples in history from many different countries. China did it in Tinanmen Sq. India did it in Amritsar's Golden Temple. British govt did it in Jalian Wala Bagh in India. (In fact British govt did it in many of their colonial countries.) How come none of these is illegal, but only Saddam's ?
What is it the US govt is doing in Iraq now ? Is it not using brutal force and mercilessly killing Iraqis to suppress rebellion/insurgency ?
2006-12-27 09:41:11 · answer #4 · answered by ramshi 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No Government or Government leader is innocent in any Country in the whole wide world. If there is a hell, they will all be there together.
2006-12-27 09:33:39 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if the pretext of the war is false, he is guilty of so many other crimes and human rights violations that he needs to be gone.
2006-12-27 08:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Biker 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hah. This is the decline of humanity right here. Why would you, even for a second, doubt his guilt.......it's the liberal media hard at work.
2006-12-27 08:43:12 · answer #7 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No he is not, neither G. W. Bush, Tony Blair, Donald Rumsfeld and other criminals.
2006-12-27 08:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding or what?
He is guilty of killing scores of his own people.
He is guilty of stealing from his own people.
He is guilty of wars, famine, strife.
He is a toad.
2006-12-27 08:42:30 · answer #9 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you have to ask..... then what do you think? No wait on 2nd thought I don't want to know.
2006-12-27 08:46:55 · answer #10 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he is innocent...
Why did they fing him guilty of crimes against humanity?
2006-12-27 08:42:25 · answer #11 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋