true enough, church and state need to be seperate to prevent the dark ages from happening, you know that period of time (roughly a thousand years) where no advancements were made cause the church had to much power!
2006-12-27 07:28:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by scuba_steve 3
·
9⤊
1⤋
section humorous, section annoying. yet maximum regrettably, untrue. contemporary circumstances 'we' mixed politics and faith, Israel replaced into based, the U. S. waged conflict on Afghanistan, the Persian president doubted the Holocaust ever happened.. and there is further and extra approximately faith and politics interior the papers daily. Politics must be separated from faith. Marx as an occasion gave that a bypass, yet i do no longer think of it's going to easily ever happen. Getting burnt on the stake is the least absolutely everyone ought to anticipate for being a libertine recently.
2016-10-19 01:23:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I feel that while we each have our own individual religious feelings and beliefs that we have to be very very careful how we let them infuse themselves into our politics. This country is intended to embrace ALL religions; not just one (Protestantism). That means that NOWHERE was one religion designated as primary, superceding the others.
This is a country of freedom and choice, and it is not up to ONE religion to try to dictate, designate or otherwise limit our choices based on their particular sectarian beliefs.
Make no mistake about it; the religious right had expressed political agendas and they would be delighted to be able to control what you and I see, read, hear, etc.
How ironic that this administration took them for a joy ride just to get their votes.
That, my friends, is despicable.
2006-12-27 07:36:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, it's true that the state-religion combination of the middle ages did some horrible things, like burn people at the stake. Like the crusades. Like the inquisition. Like wiping out millions of native americans who wouldn't convert.
Unfortunately, though, the statement is not accurate...there are a number of places in the world TODAY where church and state are still intimately tied together. Where? Iran. Saudi Arabia...just to name a couple. Would *you* want to live under those governments?
2006-12-27 07:29:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I like it. Although we mix religion and politics regularly. And I am infuriated by this. Delusional idiots telling members of the reality based community what they can and cannot do.
2006-12-27 07:29:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Handsome Devil 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
Someone ought to tell Martin Luther King's family about it. I think they might disagree.
How sad it is, that the faith that sustained Washington at Valley Forge, Lincoln and the abolitionists, FDR in the depths of WWII and Dr. King (read all their speeches!) must now be junked, because it interferes with the desire of some to have abortion on demand and state-sanctioned homosexual unions.
2006-12-27 07:27:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
I feel that it is important, but it is definitely not the last time we mixed politics with religion. We have a current president who says he takes his advice from a "higher authority". He promotes public funding of faith-based work. He hires generals to who publicly state that "our god is stronger than their god". The list goes on. It's nuts...
2006-12-27 07:33:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by firefly 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Anytime religion and politics mix then the people will suffer. History shows that to be true.
2006-12-27 07:28:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Yes,the Revs Al and Jesse need to shut their pie holes and stay out of politics.
2006-12-27 07:34:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by bugeyes 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Truthful to a fault. It wasn't called the "Dark Ages" for nothing..
"Get over it" is such an empty phrase. Find a real justification for your actions instead of childishly whining "move on, it's over, that was yesterday".
2006-12-27 07:27:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
4⤊
3⤋