Do you think its right or not. What should be done to him otherwise. Do you think this is going to cause more turmoil in Iraq or not. Write down any thoughts that you have on this suject.
2006-12-27 06:26:59 · 19 answers · asked by Argent 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
that is a tough question. i feel it is right and wrong. if iraqis had overthrown him i would have to say i agree. his crime is stopping assasination attempts and attempts to overthrow his government. the fact that an outside force removed him makes it just more interference in the ME. a cause of most of the problems in the ME. his death will most likely elevate the violence.
2006-12-27 06:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by kissmy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The verdict was very good and was done under Iraqi law.
I don't think that this verdict is going to cause any turmoil in Iraq. It might help, who knows until the sentence is carried out.
2006-12-27 06:34:24 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Basically, the whole Iraq experiment is such a disaster that I really don't think it matters either way what happens to Saddam at this point. The whole place is imploding into civil war so rapidly that I honestly don't believe there really is anything America can do anymore except leave. We'll just be supporting one faction of Iraqis vs another faction of Iraqis.
2006-12-27 06:36:15 · answer #3 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it was a step towards the healing of a nation. No I think there will be a little blip of whiners, but on the whole, the nation can begin to move forward. The Shiite and the Kurds will be positively ecstatic. I suspect even some of the Sunni's will be glad its over too.
2006-12-27 06:32:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There have been individuals whose actions are so heinous that they exceed societies ability to adequately punish. i.e. Hitler, Idi Amin, I think Saddam certainly falls in this category. Hanging is a moderate soloution, personally I think he should be publically beheaded and that should be put on pay per view, the income from this used to defray the costs of the war.
2006-12-27 06:36:23 · answer #5 · answered by Richard P 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Excellent question. I oppose the death penalty, so I have to say that I oppose Saddam Hussein's verdict. That said, if there is anyone who deserves the death penalty, it's him!
2006-12-27 06:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Even before the trial began, the world at large knew that the death penalty would be the court's final ruling, there was not any doubt about it.
2006-12-27 06:31:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
in the start, maximum previous trials took see you later because the courts actual necessary someone in court docket to attempt. maximum conflict criminals flee the country of the crime. Saddam had it coming. maximum U.N. tribunals were actual buoreaucratic and were given not some thing performed.
2016-12-01 05:43:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind, Saddam will be blowing in the wind!
2006-12-27 06:33:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I heard there are many iraquis lining up and wanting to be the one carry out the execution.
2006-12-27 06:33:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋