It's because somewhere along the line, self esteem became more important than competence. You don't want to mess with little junior's self esteem, so he gets a prize too. That way, even a loser can feel important. Which IS ridiculous.
2006-12-27 04:39:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Baby'sMom 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
If the winner won by cheating then yes, but if h played fair and won then the loser shouldn't under any circumstances get the same or bigger prize then the winner. Because the guy fought very hard to win, he deserves that price because he is that good but the loser should get a less valuable prize for trying as hard.
2006-12-27 04:54:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Faust 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually you only see consolation prizes when it comes to things involving children. Most compitions involving adults have a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. The rest are losers. The consolation prizes for children are there for the basic purpose of saving face and feelings.
2006-12-27 04:53:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥♥Soon to Be Mrs.F♥♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah, it's not like that. It just depends on the contest. And if the prize is a consolation prize, then you are defeat because you could have still reached a high level and you didn't.
2006-12-27 04:40:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cheshire Riddle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nobody in America is a loser, God forbid. We all have to have our fragile egos propped up with the smallest of achievements "Oh, Johnny! good for you, you zipped up your own pants!". Johnny is probably 27 years old. We have a lot of losers but "no child is left behind". Ugh.
2006-12-27 04:41:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because they want the losers to know they did good even though they lost.
2006-12-27 04:50:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by candylicker_2010 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOU! are the first person on here that i have seen spell Losers right!!!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!! i thought everyone was thick on here!! THANK YOU so much!!!
since i joined this site not one person has spelt loser right! i joined about 6 months ago! they spell it loose grrr
-maybe the people that run the losing/winner thingys fee guilty about not giving the losers anything.
the world has gone mad!
2006-12-27 04:41:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fader's Girl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a person is the best loser, doesn't that make them a winner?
2006-12-27 04:41:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by tallerfella 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO! we win because we try. whether we get a prize or not we still won. losers did not win.
2006-12-27 04:43:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by jazz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No losers should not be winners. I agree its lame. Everyone needs to stop being such big babies.
2006-12-27 04:39:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by mrlebowski99 6
·
0⤊
0⤋