good benfits and the schedual is better for when i start my real estate the begining of the year. mind you guys dont have any kids or a lot of bills dont hav any reason to go back to the old job but just for the money?
2006-12-27 03:44:59 · 15 answers · asked by andrea y 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Don't go back to the old job if it sucked. Your happiness is more important then money. Especially if your not in any financial strain.
2006-12-27 03:47:23 · answer #1 · answered by lstgrl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it depends on how long you plan on staying at the old job if you do go back. If there are less benefits that's not somewhere I'd like to invest a lot of time. If you go back, I'd only go back short time to take advantage of the money, save it up and such and be looking for another job with better benefits and higher pay in the meanwhile. If you plan on staying at the new job longterm, I'd take that one with the lower pay because you'll have an opportunity to take advantage of the benefits.
2006-12-27 03:58:19 · answer #2 · answered by Jeanelle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I work for the state of California and the Benefits are great! but the pay sucks.. everyone elsewhere gets great pay but sucky benefits.. so it depends on what you want.. I would choose the Benefits cause in the long run with the good pay you still have to pay for those Good Benefits and you want get the nice discount .. the state pays for the majority of our benefits and after retirement.. things like medical will be paid for you .. some companies you have to pay your own medical.
2006-12-27 03:48:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please know that real estate has high potential for earning, yet the first year you should plan on either a second income or support from a significant other. There are no guarantees in sales. Many people work a second job during the first year of sales, and do their real estate part-time. Don’t plan on making all of your money at once.
2006-12-27 03:51:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me money would not matter with a job. You spend the majority of your time there and if it is not enjoyable then no money is worth it.
Take the lesser paying one that has the better schedule and better benefits. You'll be happier.
2006-12-27 03:47:10 · answer #5 · answered by Emily B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We all love to see our pay checks looking good, but think again if the benefits are good and the check is a little less I would go for the benefits.
2006-12-27 03:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by maria fkun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take the job that offered less pay and better benefits. You can't put a price on your peace of mind.
2006-12-27 03:47:21 · answer #7 · answered by sleepingliv 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For one ingredient, it relies upon on how previous the expenses are. in the event that they're 5 or 6 years previous and previous the statute of barriers to collect, they are going to drop off your credit record after 7 years besides. that's a ingredient of the FDCPA from the FTC. If a debt collector tells you that they are going to sell it to somebody else and the 7 years starts throughout, they're mendacity to you. that's against the regulation for them to redate the debt and the unique deliquency date holds up no rely who they sell it to. If the debt is in basic terms a 12 months or 2 previous and the detrimental counsel continues to be going to be on your record for the great 7 years, deliquent and "Paid" seems greater useful than in basic terms the undesirable counsel and unpaid.
2016-10-19 01:03:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the new job has enough pay for you to live on and better bennefits then it is best to take the job with bennefits. Money isn't everything!
2006-12-27 03:52:37 · answer #9 · answered by freakyallweeky 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To tell you the truth you should see if the benefits are useful from the second job. if they are keep the second job. if not then choose the other job
2006-12-27 03:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋