If Saddam is on trial for being the "Butcher of Baghdad"... shouldn't the "Bush Whackers" be co-defendants

Question

Since the Bush father & son duo killed over 3 MILLION Iraqis combined.

Bush Sr was the VP when the Reagan administration supplied Saddam with weapons and chemicals used in the gassing of thousands of Iraqis. Bush Sr still professed his love for Saddam when he became president.

Bush Sr incited a revolt after the gulf war, promising help in overthrowing Saddam. Yet did nothing while Saddam massacred over 500,000 Iraqis who had revolted believing the Bush Sr would help.

Bush Sr introduced the UN sanctions which resulted in millions of Iraqi women and children dying from hunger and lack of medicine.

Bush Jr invaded Iraq which killed over 100,000 Iraqi civilians. Thousands have died since due to car bombings, lack of medicine/food, etc.

So that's over 3 MILLION the Bush Whackers have killed. So where's the justice?

Answer 1

great answer theooldman..very impressive. Also that is right, hello u...no links between al quaida and Saddam.

Saddam was hung for killing 148 (hundreds), Osama is a terrorst for killing thousands but Bush and his administrations kill millions and get off scott free.

You di not include the millions who will and are being killed by our use of depleted uranium..about 600,000 atomic bombs worth...that kill civilians in over a dozen countries, innocent civilians, other species, and future generations via cancer increases (up over 1000%), birth deformities (many have died and those who survive have a horrible quality of life as the deformities are so unbelievably horrible), and sicknesses such as gulf war syndrome

Also our own troops are sent home in the thousands, discharged, and dying and not included in the count..Many of them will have children with very serious deformities like missing limbs and eyes. ..but the Iraqi babies it even worse--have a single eye in forehead, intestines on the ouside, huge tumors where their weyes should be, and just hideous deformities wore than any I have ever seen. making it worse is we knew the effects of these weapons from other conflicts like gulf war one and Cosevo..saw the troops die (13,000 gulf i vets) and about 2/3 rdsof them have kids deformed. We saw the Iraqi babies and we knew not how to clean all the contaminated food and water and the environment, but we continued to use these weapsons anyway.This is a sin of the highest magnetude and a true crime against humanity and people....far beyond the normal war..

I saw on the governments website once info that they knew people would be outraged by the massive health and environmetal damage and suggestions to hush it up and minimize it.

this use of depleted (and also nondepleted) uranium alone warrents the hanging of Bush and his cohorts and the military leaders who did this. What comes around will go around, not to Bush but to us as most countries besides ours know what we did in this regard and they will retaliate and try to stop us.

Answer 2

Read the charges against Saddam and you will see it is a convenient year for both the prosecution and the United States, 1989.
Nothing can be brought up against US complicity since then in is crimes. In fact to even call Saddams court appearances a trial is so far out of line from Amerian Juris Prudence procedures as to be called just what it is, a Kangaroo court.
Not one document was presented or an eyewitness shown that said he personaly executed or ordered executed those dead. Not a one. Yet the testimonys did bring out he was the man in charge during times atrocitys were commited.
Guilty as charged and vengence assured. to heck with Jusitice just get it over with.
In fact the very legality of the judges is questioned as under the Internatinal rules of law the occupyer does not have ability to appoint judges as they then are under occupiers control.
that is one reason the first judge had to suspend himslef before final verdict was read.. As supposedly now the Iraquis have their own government. Remember they voted for it?
B.S.
Saddam was an atrcious leader yes but he was no more an atrocious leader than the US has proven to be in Iraq.
For while spreading democracy, after no WMD's to excuse our actions, we have killed far more than Saddam ever could of no matter how supposedly evil he was.

Answer 3

Yeah, i think of all people could extremely have a Peterson form decrease back however the uncomplicated fact is DMC couldnt cope with that form of load. i in my opinion dont have faith that he's a guy who would provide you 25-30 includes a sport. He could be a tremendous complimentary decrease back yet he's amazingly lots a Reggie Bush form of participant... tremendous velocity yet geared up greater like a thick wideout than a runner. Throw in his off container indiscretions and you have have been given a suited bust waiting to happen.

Answer 4

I must deduce you are an Iraqi insurgent with a gross IQ of 44 to even ask this question. In the future, stop listening to Howard Dean and the Ayotolahs and get facts before you post, we will all thank you for it I am sure.

Answer 5

Isn't it just like a liberal to take the blame off of the viciousness of this evil preditor and blame someone else?!! I don't care if Bush attended his tea parties, Saddam still brutalized, raped, tortured and committed mass genocide a few times and THERE IS a direct link to him and Bin Laden so he needs to go!!! It scares me the liberals see evil at it's worse and rather than call it out as it is they blame someone or something else. YOU LIBERALS are going to be our downfall yet!

Answer 6

don't listen to these clueless republicans..... Saddam had no links to Al Qaeda or 9/11. He even turned away Al Qaeda members who begged him to hide them in Iraq.

Answer 7

I STRONGLY AGREE,

RIP SADDAM
DESPITE UR RECORD, THE PPL WHO DID THIS TO U ARE 100 TIMES WORST!!!!

IT WAS AN EVIL AND UNJUST ACT TO INVADE IRAQ,

AND THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION SHOULD BE THE NEXT TO BE HANGED!!!!!

Answer 8

Who are you? Were you involved in the government when this was going on? If you were you are also accountable. And you must have been, you seem to have inside information. If you are correct in this, then go to the news media. Give them your proof. Or are you just another ill informed person trying to cause more trouble? Just another person that has no idea what the hell you are talking about? I bet you are. Aren't you?

Answer 9

then, why dont we try President Clinton for killing children in Iraq during his tenure, and also try him for killing children in Sudan in 1998.
Also why dont we try President Jimmy Carter for his incompetence during the Iran crisis

Answer 10

Hate is such an awful waste of energy.