As Bush and this administration would like people to believe?
2006-12-27 03:28:49 · 6 answers · asked by kissmybum 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The US was supporting Chalabi(and the Shiite resistance) long before 9/11.
2006-12-27 03:47:59 · update #1
no
2006-12-27 03:32:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you are a Democrat. They seem to ignore the facts and focus on the absurd. The Republican talking heads focus on the absurd also when it comes to Democrats, but they did get one thing right, there were intel agencies from countries all over the globe that said Saddam had the WMDs. Not just one man. But hundreds were involved in the intel gathering. They all agreed.
Please do not think that everything you hear from your party is correct. Both parties are full liars. I was a Republican for years, but now I am an independent, I just started thinking for myself. The lies on both sides are just to blatant. And I am tired of being taken for a fool Aren't you? One other point, the buck stops with the head of any department. He has the responsibility to make sure that all is correct in his department. And that is why Mr. Bush is the one we all are holding to account. Who held Clinton to account? Replace all of them I say! Start fresh all around. All new politicians, ones from the real world would be nice for a change. And intelligent voters would be too! Think for yourself! There is enough blame to go around for all of us!
2006-12-27 11:47:23 · answer #2 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man to blame is an informant code-named "Curveball". He told a pack of lies to induce us to topple Saddam and install his friend, Achmed Chalaby, as President. German intelligence warned us that he was unreliable, but the Bush Administration was eager to believe, so they did. And for that they can be blamed.
2006-12-27 11:32:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Unlikely, unless you have a power-structure where one man is responsible for making the "final decision". A Democratic Republic, say... (yes, I guess that sort of implies George is responsible.)
2006-12-27 11:32:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. The Bush administration relied on single sources (curve ball) and suppressed what didn't serve their agenda.
2006-12-27 11:33:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It wasn't that erroneous.
The Democrats sure believed it.
They Demanded that Bush do something about Saddam. And they they voted to attack.
You never see or watch ALL the news, eh?
2006-12-27 11:34:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋