Pot, Kettle springs to mind here.
2006-12-27 03:19:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Believe it has to do with the horrific job "W" has performed. It has insulted and embarrassed his supporters, then for a women especially Clinton who had the greatest following from both sides to come in and straighten this calamity makes them shutter.
2006-12-27 03:33:23 · answer #1 · answered by edubya 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I fail to see your point. Is Hillary anti-abortion? Anti-gay marriage? At that, Hillary is a much better presidential candidate than any other democrats I've seen so far. BTW, I am also critical of President Bush sometimes.. just not on a world stage. Nor will I be critical of Hillary in a like manner if she does get elected.
2006-12-27 11:27:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't see what being critical of Hillary has to do with supporting Bush. Oh and John it's "they're" not "their." It would be wise to use correct spelling before you say someone is not smart.
2006-12-27 11:29:57 · answer #3 · answered by ReedRothchild 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Are you referring to her voting record, wealthy family ties, scandal embattled history or a combination of all 3 ?
She is as Faustian as any other candidate .. she certainly does not come from a left side of the isle stock? and yet Hillary like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry have come to represent especially to the "fox" crowd, the embodiment of liberalism, feminism, and progressive politics at it's most non gay bashing, vegetarian worst.
I wonder if Middle America were to actually be exposed to some true social minded, labor concerned free thinking progressives ..if they wouldn't change their shopping habits and start watching the nightly news with a little more scrutiny? If any of you have tuned into Free Speech Television and listened to freaked out callers that have just spent the the last 3 days glued to their sets... They're angry,scared and confused.. but they're alive. it's really quite something to hear "passion" come out of their tired soma dried throats.
Hillary, Bush, Hitler, Stalin.... they all share one thing.
2006-12-27 11:35:40 · answer #4 · answered by sitizen_x 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Easy, you can be critical of whoever you care to. Maybe I'm not too gall darn schmart, but I don't see what supporting Bush has to do with Hillary.
Those WHO not THAT.
2006-12-27 11:29:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
How can anyone support the Devil? Bush has been our worst enemy with all of his asinine statements like: "Axis of Evil," and "Bring them on." We need a "unite-er," not a divider. United we stand. Divided we fall. There are many web sites that go on for ever with clips of his gaffs. (Check out the link in source below.) Actually we can forgive such things and laugh at his honest mistakes, but invading Iraq with contrived information is out of that ball park.
2006-12-27 11:32:01 · answer #6 · answered by Pey 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NOT QUITE. HILLARY IS NOTHING MORE THAN A VERY DANGEROUS WOMAN. I THINK FORMER CLINTON ADVISOR
DICK MORRIS GOT IT RIGHT WHEN HE SAID HE WILL LEAVE THE COUNTRY IF HILLARY BECOMES PRESIDENT. IF THAT HAPPENS WILL THE LAST PERSON TO LEAVE PLEASE TURN OFF THE LIGHTS.
2006-12-27 14:10:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is called "freethinking', and free speech. Here in America we are allowed to practice those freedoms without fear unlike countries that were ruled by Saddam, Stalin, and others.
2006-12-27 12:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Even if i didn't support Bush,i would still be critical of Hitlery Clinton.She is a nut job.
2006-12-27 11:31:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
George Bush isn't a left wing socialist. You are comparing apples to oranges.
2006-12-27 11:28:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋