The costums, props and sets where excellent, playing 80's and 90's pop culture hits just didnt cut it.
My question is, why spend so much money on a movie and then bugger it up by making it a 2 hour running music video?
2006-12-27 01:46:27 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
thank you! i completely agree. The setting and costums were beautiful but the music was awlful and it wasn't accurate at all at the end. i was disappointed. I think they were trying to reach teeny-boppers instead of an adult audience.
2006-12-27 01:55:51 · answer #1 · answered by akc6763 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. She wanted to evoke Marie Antoinette's character in a way that modern movie watchers will understand. Yeah, the concept is quite far-off and may be pretentious to the fact that she wanted it to sound cool...but wasn't the music of the 80's a lynchpin on its vices? Marie Antoinette was a party animal, something like an educated Paris Hilton who had everything already (not as an inheritance). The music was there to make the wild, vice-filled, emotional, party-going theme revolve. Its ok for me to be experimental.
2006-12-27 09:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by hegelian 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Going into the movie I was expecting a lot more of the music. I was more disappointed with the direction of the second half of the movie than the music.
2006-12-27 09:54:59 · answer #3 · answered by erin7 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't know.
2006-12-27 09:59:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋