How long would it be before poor old Prince Harry was assassinated,
Because being next in line to the throne the last thing the royals would want is to lose the royal bloodline which they would if prince Harry or his children if he had any became king
What I am saying is if you look at James Hewitt (who was Princess diana's lover) and then look at prince Harry you can see who his father is
Also Harry looks nothing like Prince Charles or Prince William.
2006-12-27 01:42:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
First off the English will NEVER admit that Harry might not be Charles'. Secondly, if you look through the history of the British monarchy, you will find that blood lines have been sketchy at best before, so I would stress over it.
For those keeping score the here is the line of succession As best I can surmise
Charles
William
Harry
Andrew
Beatrice
Eugenie
Edward
Louise
Anne
Peter
Zara
2006-12-27 09:30:29 · answer #1 · answered by rehobothbeachgui 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The ONLY time that Charles and William was on holiday together was during the Austrailia trip in 1983. If by chance they were both killed, then Harry would be the next king, however Hewitt is NOT the father, there are similarites of Harry and his royal family, not immediate family, but down the line, he most looks like Diana's side. After Harry is Prince Andrew (and then his two daughters) and then Edward (and any children he has) and then Princess Anne and her children.
2006-12-27 06:06:38 · answer #2 · answered by Cheyenne 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it's suspicious, but William doesn't look like Charles either. But does it matter? Really, who knows who might be the father of any royal children born in the last 1000 years? I'm sure a Queen messed up at some point in history..
2006-12-27 15:40:38 · answer #3 · answered by Sandy Lou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Diana, in an internationally televised interview said she had an affair with James Hewiit but it started long after Harry was born. Charles could easily do a DNA test, which the Royals would insist on, if they doubted Harry's paternity as Harry is the spare to the throne.
2006-12-27 02:45:44 · answer #4 · answered by Debra D 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Any proof that he isnt Charles's ? If he was assassinated, then Prince Charles's oldest brother would take the throne
2006-12-27 13:29:57 · answer #5 · answered by Mike J 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The chances of Charles and William travelling in the same car is very very slim. In fact I would say that it wouldn't happen.
2006-12-27 19:43:20 · answer #6 · answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could somewhat like them the two to be king because it somewhat is their start precise Charles has maximum of sturdy characteristics and he will make a brilliant king. i would not like his spouse to be queen nonetheless.William has maximum of actually sturdy characteristics additionally we could do no longer forget that the two Charles and William have been reported with the information that at some point they are going to be king .their total lives have been in coaching for that day. the two need to be king in the order that it somewhat is meant to be..( William has stepped forward alot of his mothers extraordinary characteristics and those will help to make him certainly one of our terrific kings ever )
2016-10-28 11:20:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the Royals - you should be glad we don't have to put all our faith into Tony Blair! And Diana wouldn't cheat on her husband, I think it's horrible that you want to say such horrible things about a dead woman.
2006-12-27 02:36:49 · answer #8 · answered by floppity 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Diana created an heir and a spare... the spare would become WELL PROTECTED until he produced a successor... or "obtained" one.
2006-12-27 01:52:50 · answer #9 · answered by confused 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Never happen as they are not allowed to travel together, should such an event happen!
2006-12-27 01:49:31 · answer #10 · answered by simon m 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋