.
2006-12-27 01:05:18 · 7 answers · asked by Isabel F 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
sequel? why should there be a sequel?
Vanilla Sky is just an English version of an spanish move Abre los Ojos. Cameron Crowe loved it so much that he decided to make an english version. No offense to others, but for me vanilla sky is one of the best...it is something that you have to watch closely so you'll get to understand every twist of it...
"every passing minute is another chance to turn it all around"
-sofia, Vanilla Sky
2006-12-27 01:24:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
See thats what i hate, there are movies that aren't suppose to have a sequel like Mrs.Doubtfire(1992) which you won't believe is getting a sequel while sequels that are needed like Vanilla sky 2 aren't being made so in my opinion yed there should be a vanilla sky 2 with Tom Cruise as the main lead that is.
2006-12-27 01:13:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avzfw
Rebecca's on the right track...nice job, young lady!! Tom Cruise's tragic character was frozen in suspended animation; his dream-like thoughts flowed on through time, conflicted with what was dream and what was real. The 'program' only inferres Cruise should relax, but he pressed on--and was offered two options: stay in the dream world....or return to reality. Cruise's character chose the latter---about 300 years ahead in time. By then, his deformed, scarred face was most likely reconstructed/restored or he was "transferred" into another healthy man's body. The writers left the ending totally up to each one of us, which is clever......or maybe they were thinking of hammering out a sequel--something Cruise likely would turn down.
2016-04-04 22:11:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The way I understood it was that Tom Cruise was brought out of his state of suspended animation in which his dreams/programmed fantasy had gone awry. He had been made aware that all the proceeding was just a glitch in program by the company. It was now the distant future and those he loved were all dead. He now had the choice to return to fantasy or face the real world and unknown in the future. Seeing how badly his fantasy world had turned out, he selects to move forward and try to carve a life out for himself in the real world. End of movie. It has been a loong time since I've seen it, so I might be remembering it wrong lol.
2016-03-19 09:10:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
GOD FORBID! what, one unbelivably terrible movie isn't enuff for you??? what is wrong with you! i want the 2 hours of my life spent on "Vanilla Sky" back!
2006-12-27 02:21:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes, definitely.
2006-12-27 01:06:59 · answer #6 · answered by yahoo 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh god NO!!!!! The first one was one of the worst 10 movies ever made..... worst than home alone 3+4.....
2006-12-27 01:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
NO, two reasons. One - they will ruin it and two - Tom Cruise has totally gone nuts since the first one......
2006-12-27 01:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by kitkat 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes
2006-12-27 01:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by faithnack 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I do not think so at all. The first one was really dumb.
2006-12-27 01:10:06 · answer #10 · answered by Osunwole Adeoyin 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋