Fools seldom think the matter through, so either automatically disagree or agree, without thinking but by impulse.
2006-12-27 15:04:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Disagree
2006-12-27 01:22:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Reel Homme 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe. But what about skeptics? Skeptics live in their own little clubs, creating experiments to test things they don't believe in, and if things test proof positive, they assume the experiment wasn't done right, so they retest it with better perameters until it prooves their ideas. They all agree in disagreeing with everything, making them fools as well. So fools may seldom disagree, but fools can also disagree and still be fools too.
2006-12-27 04:00:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr. Psychosis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rationality is all a remember of attitude. you could nonetheless basically be as rational because of the fact the information they have. Now, in the event that they willingly ignore approximately what they be attentive to, then they're of course being irrational. even nonetheless, if somebody would not have each and all the information, their movements may well be completely rational from their attitude regardless of in the event that they look wildly irrational to a greater pronounced observer. So somewhat, it relies upon on which attitude you think approximately whilst defining what's rational. in case you think approximately the perspective of the action taker, then i could say definite, for the main area, human beings act rationally, yet once you think approximately authentic rationality, from the perspective of somebody who possesses each and all the information that could probably be had, we are going to probably never be attentive to if anybody has ever been rational.
2016-10-28 11:18:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great men don't think alike, and the greater each is, the more different he'll be than anyone else. And if you have the courage to disagree with everyone, then you're really special.
2006-12-27 01:07:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Maus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree!
Whether one agrees or disagrees, if it is not based on proper logic and knowledge, then one is a fool... the wise either agree or disagree based on knowledgeable logic.
2006-12-27 01:56:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello Sudeep! Indeed fools seldom disagree, and I agree that they don't agree to disagree, fools that is, and not you and I !!! :)
2006-12-27 01:24:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Paraphrasing here.
He who knows not, but knows not that he knows not, is merely ignorant. Pity him.
He who knows not, but knows that he knows not, is wise, if and when he attempts to gain "Knowing." Applaud him.
It's unlikely that fools or wise men are much different in agreeing or disagreeing, and that most often relates to them, in conversation with the "self."
Steven Wolf
2006-12-27 01:09:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by DIY Doc 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
What I've heard is: smart men can recognize genius, but mediocre men can recognize nothing above themselves.
2006-12-27 01:11:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by OrtegaFollower 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree!
2006-12-27 01:06:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
1⤊
0⤋