2006-12-27 00:52:31 · 16 answers · asked by A Baby Ate My Dingo 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Note: Knowingly sending Americans to die in a fraudulent war is most certainly both murder and treason. Even if he didn't know it was false pretenses, he SHOULD have, and that is criminally negligent homicide and also treason.
2006-12-27 03:05:37 · update #1
iam absoloutly with you
2006-12-27 01:02:49 · answer #1 · answered by !!!$weet!!! 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
I thought that is was the Islamofascist terrorists in Iraq (and other places) who were doing the vast majority of the killings.
But then again, it's people like you who believe that GWB blew up the WTC, etc...so Mr. "Kumbaya" Bin Laden is a bad yardstick to measure murders by.
2006-12-27 09:57:57 · answer #2 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Where do / did you get your murder figures? How do you justify your statement when Bush is fighting a war that he FINALLY admits America is loosing and, regardless, until he is caught or killed, Bin Laden can go on scheming, planning and killing? Everybody has a right to their own opinion.
2006-12-27 09:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Suppose American soldiers died in a just war (only suppose-this is not the case here), would the president be considered a murderer?! Of course not. But of course, Penis Clinton and George W Bullshit should be put on trial as war criminals. As a South African citizen, I am working on creating a political party in S. Africa with the aim of bringing Injustice Goldstone to justice (as well as giving amnesty to political prisoners).
2006-12-27 09:46:12 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hmm. According to the law, dying in a war isn't techincally the same as being murdered, so I don't think that would work. However, I definetely think we should impeach him for lying about the reason why we went to war with Iraq. He said that Saddam had ties to Al Kida (I know that's spelled wrong) and that he had WMD's, when in fact neither were true and Bush knew it.
2006-12-27 09:43:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
~I wish! He is the one responsible for starting a war without a "valid" reason. Republicans all believed Saddam had WMD! Then it was, we should go in debt forever and "save" people that hate us and don't even want us there!
Since when was our obligation to "save" every country?~
Peace
2006-12-27 09:21:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Murder?!
You liberals need to get a grip. Your hatred has stripped you of all capacity for reason.
You just won Congress and they're promising not to be too liberal until the Democrats also control the White House, so in 2 years you'll get to be in charge then us conservatives can go back to whining.
You won. You won. Let it go.
(Actually, we're not too thrilled with Bush and the last Congress either, but that's another story...)
2006-12-27 08:57:41 · answer #7 · answered by MithrilHawk 4 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Such ridiculous arguments do absolutely no favors to whatever agenda you're pushing. They only make you look like an overemotional ignoramus. You can do better than that.
As the previous person said, some of you liberals need to get a grip. Your hatred of Bush goes way, way out of bounds sometimes.
.
.
2006-12-27 08:58:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
As much as I dislike GW Bush, I'd rather he not be impeached.
Having Dick Cheney as President would be a fate worse than death.
2006-12-27 09:49:19 · answer #9 · answered by pastor of muppets 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Why not we got one impeached for MUCH less! He didn't kill anyone, just got a lil something something while he was in office!!
2006-12-27 09:26:37 · answer #10 · answered by momof3 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush has not murdered anyone and it is assine to say something like that.
2006-12-27 09:08:46 · answer #11 · answered by Damn Good Dawg 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋