2006-12-26 21:15:55 · 15 answers · asked by ganesh p 1 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
yes.
living is right, not a mandatory requirement and something to be uphold no matter what circumstance.
if people are suffering, they should be able to waive their rights to live.
2006-12-27 16:29:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If I were terminally ill, in pain or unconscious, I would want to be allowed to go and not prolong either my suffering or my familie's expense. Medicine has made some great strides, but in some cases it just prolongs the suffering, not the quality of life.
2006-12-27 16:19:58 · answer #2 · answered by hoodoowoman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard....in Holland it is allowed
I think that if there's no chance of coming back it should be allowed. Take poor Ariel Sharon. He's mind will never be the same, he will never have mental faculties again. For almost an year he's been tortured. He's only suffering and the doctors should know that.
There are terminal diseases which torture you unto madness. if you want to be put down, if you have thought it all then I think you should be allowed to dye
2006-12-26 22:56:25 · answer #3 · answered by oana 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it should be a choice in certain circumstances. Anyone who has had to watch their loved one die a slow painful death of cancer, have their love one beg for help because of the pain and not be able to help them would agree. It's a horrific thing to go through.
2006-12-26 22:34:15 · answer #4 · answered by Proud to be APBT 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it should be allowed- people should not have to suffer- if they are termianal and dont want to live the why make them? It will jst prolong the suffering
2006-12-26 21:24:28 · answer #5 · answered by mclaren d 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it should be allowed. It is a personal choice that someone must have medical approval to do.
2006-12-27 03:02:32 · answer #6 · answered by Mimi 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
as long as there is no chance of your makeing a recovery, if you are in enough pain and have suffered long enough to be asking the question to start with then, yes.
2006-12-27 06:30:20 · answer #7 · answered by Julie Hartford 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes on humans only and innocent animals only if suffering
2006-12-26 21:19:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
it should be about choice...more and more peopple are suffering longer and longer. It's a trend that will continue.
Although we are living longer, we are suffering longer...
2006-12-26 21:18:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
only on violent dogs like pit bulls or any dog that attacks. and murderers(who should be killed by being stoned so that they suffer like their victim)This of course is for only the cold-blooded murderers(and child molesters
2006-12-26 21:27:05 · answer #10 · answered by George G 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋