The invasion of Iraq was not jutified.It resulted in killing more than 655000 innocent Iraqis and loosing of abuot 3000 American young soliders as well as the compete destruction of Iraqi infrastructure and strenthening of Iran.
2006-12-26 21:09:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Being humans, anybody can make a mistake. In case of Bush, even this is unpardonable. Because the whole world was screaming there are no WMDs and not to inavde Iraq. But he did not listen.
What is more, he keeps insisting he has been right all along. Why ? Admit mistake and give up Presidency. Be stubborn and claim you are right and you can hold on to power. I cannot think of anything more evil than this.
For just one killing, people have been given death sentences. For killing 3000 of our best soldiers, what punishment can be there ? Let alone hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi lives. Probably even Hitler would shudder at the enormity of this crime.
2006-12-26 23:30:55 · answer #1 · answered by ramshi 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
first of all there's no longer any good issues Dubya has executed. there is hundreds of fabric pointing out that Osama Ben encumbered from Afghanistan and the Saudi Arabians have been the unfavourable forces in the back of 9/11. Bush/ Chaney went into Irag for oil earnings no longer being concerned what number lives and tax funds are wasted.
2016-11-23 19:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee, you make a fantastic point. Don't forget to sentence all of the U.S. Senators and Congressmen to death, too (another 535 dead Americans). Everyone seems to forget that they all voted to go to war, also.
I guess you'd want Saddam put to death, also, since he killed thousands of Iraqis... Oh wait, because of the U.S., Saddam will be put to death.
Be for the war or against it, but try to at least be knowledgeable about the facts. And, did you personally count the supposed "655,000" dead innocent Iraqis? It must have been hard for you to calculate, considering we completely destroyed Iraq's infrastructure.
2006-12-26 21:19:14 · answer #3 · answered by Dan K 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO cause it should have been done along time before him, but nobody else that was president had enough guts to go to war with a country that was ran by a coward, and now is left for all the cowards to take over someday, and united states will be back to finish the job, cause they will have a target to hit next time, so keep trying to sway united states people, into believing that their president is doing something wrong, to make your cowardly people look good, cause the united states will over come this and Will finish this and maybe in a manner we all wont like, but they wont stop to your cowardly ways of thinking just cause of 1 leaders mistakes.American people might not like war but they do realize that they and rest of world needed to take Saddam out of power and united states went in regardless outcome to make a more safe and peaceful world.Has to be WAR for PEACE!and UNITED WE STAND.
2006-12-26 21:27:22 · answer #4 · answered by bri n 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't really have a good answer.... My husband is currently in Iraq, fighting in this unwanted war, and I can't honestly say what we should do about the president. The number of American deaths has now surpassed the number of fatalities that occurred on 9/11.... I don't understand why we're still over there, or how President Bush can sleep at night when thousands of our soldier's deaths are on his shoulders. I wish I had an unbiased opinion, but when in fear for a loved ones life, all you want is to stop and exact revenge on those who are endangering them... Unfortunately at this point in time, the most dangerous person IS our leader.
2006-12-26 21:13:51 · answer #5 · answered by kimberelena 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes, every leader is responsible for death of his soldier due to his wrong choice.
Some American sense is very odd? Why?
They blame to leader for killing the humans in war in case of other countries but in the case of Bush, they say “He did not kill any one by his hand”
2006-12-26 21:46:12 · answer #6 · answered by Moonboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that is the case then all presidents that were in office during war time should also be punished. Bush is protecting America and is doing a good job. Freedom isn't free.
2006-12-27 02:49:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nice comparison. Have you lost your mind ? War is a terrible thing. To blame all deaths on our President shows off your bias in politics. No president can be the only one responsible for deaths in a war. Of those killed in Iraq, wasn't most of these deaths on the bloody hands of the suicide bombers ? Why do you excuse these murderers at the expense of our President?
2006-12-26 21:15:55 · answer #8 · answered by meathead 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You tell more lies than I do. 650,000 is a made up number because the total deaths are about 35,000, and most of those are Arabs killing Arabs. That's one thing you can count on, when they don't have anyone else to kill, they kill one-another. Iran's only in it because they want Iraq's oil. Iran's is running out and their goofy leader is spending more than he's bringing in.
2006-12-26 22:59:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are a stupid person, poster child for abortion. A low life scum of the earth. Your stupid question deserves no answer. Why do you not go back in your room and play with yourself, this is all you democrats know how to do anyway is waste people's time.
2006-12-26 21:22:38 · answer #10 · answered by m c 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋