Of killing his girlfriend and a friend.
He wrote a book about if he killed them how it was carried out.
2006-12-26 21:05:02 · 36 answers · asked by Nina 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Guilty, for sure. Yet he's still allowed to bring up those kids...
And to Marcus: there were two reasons the gloves didn't fit: first of all, they'd been soaked in blood. Have you ever had a pair of leather gloves that got completely saturated (not in blood, hopefully, but th principle is the same)? They shrink and crease up.
Secondly, OJ is usually on medication for the arthritis he suffers as a result of his football career. All he had to do was not take that for a couple of days and his hands were swollen up to a couple of sizes bigger than they'd normally be. If they weren't his size, why was a single right glove - the same size as the left found at the crime scene - found in OJ's house?
Note also that a brand new pair of the same make and size, tried on a later day, fitted OJ perfectly.
It's a shame the LAPD kept a discredited policeman on the force and that this opened the door to a murderer getting away with it.
2006-12-26 21:23:32 · answer #1 · answered by gvih2g2 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Guilty
2006-12-26 21:06:27 · answer #2 · answered by babycakes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty
2006-12-26 21:05:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
after the trial was over i heard one of the jurors interviewed - she was asked if she thought he did it or not - she said something like "oh, i definitely think he killed them both but i just dont think the prosecution made a good enough case"
and i wondered two things .... one - the prosecution didnt make a good enough case - but this juror is convinced he did it ....? doesnt that mean the prosecution DID make a good enough case ? i mean the jurors convinced , right? ---- and two - if the juror is convinced but was not allowed to submit a guilty plea due to some legal technicality then clearly the system is flawed -
yes he had a good lawyer - but the prosecution team wasnt a bunch of bumbling idiots - the two sides of the legal battle both put up the best fight that the system would allow them to do - but the system just favored the defense - and the system should favor the defense - thats how its designed - they say ... "its better for a hundred guilty people to go free than for one innocent person to be punished for a crime they didnt commit" (or something very close to that) - and i agree with that philosophy .... BUT ..... IF a juror walks out of a trial and says "i think he's guilty, but i dont think the prosecution proved it" - there is something wrong with the system DEFINITELY - i think we should change the definition of what a prosecutor can and cant do ... and what constitutes proof and what does not
2006-12-27 01:55:35 · answer #4 · answered by justfleshnblud 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watched the case all the way through. Was he guilty? He certainly knew something or may well have been there was he the killer difficult to say? Sums of money involved here with top lawyers etc evidence is easily dismissed and hidden!! The killings were brutal and seemed to be driven by anger and hatred. In answer to this gotta end with i'm not sure?(but i'm sure he knows how they met their death?)
2006-12-26 21:28:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guilty!
2006-12-26 21:06:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty!
2006-12-26 21:06:57 · answer #7 · answered by pussnboots333 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty.
He was found innocent as the police messed up the prosecution and he had the best lawyer money could buy.
He was found guilty of unlawful killing in a private prosecution bought by the family, so now he hides in part of America that doesn't legally recognise his bank balance. As it's not recognised he's deemed broke and can't pay the millions of compensation that was awarded to deceased's families.
Scumbag.
2006-12-26 21:12:03 · answer #8 · answered by salvationcity 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He was either innocent and sick in the head to write a book about it or guilty an really stupid! I am gonna put my $ on guilty and stupid! Just goes to show money makes a difference!
2006-12-26 21:21:15 · answer #9 · answered by Loren T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty but the police screwed up the case by the whole glove thing, and i think the fact that he wrote that book just proves what a sick insensitive mf he is. apparently he still hasn't given any money to the male victim's family even though he is legally meant to.
2006-12-26 21:23:37 · answer #10 · answered by keeley 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋