The very fact you made a big mistake in signing a blank plain sheet of paper . For a valid contract his offer & your acceptence is good enough even on this plain sheet of paper which he must have filled according to his interest & benfits now any challenge from your side will not be accepted by any judicial or arbitratory body unless & untill you have evidence to this effect that you only signed black sheet of paper & not a proper drafted contact regarding bond period.If you leave company after 18 months you have to compensate with fine that must be mentioned in this bond paper otherwise you boss can sue you in the court of law or arbitratory body as may be the case.
2006-12-26 23:56:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by bisexualmale s 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't you feel your signature has got some value ? Can it be put like that on any sheet of paper as if there is going to be nothing out of it ? Dear, even a thumb impression of an illeterate has got some sence and value attached to it, leave alone a signature put by an educated person like you. So, don't be in a state of doubts or confusion. You can be sued by the company for breach of contract you entered with them, whether you have signed it on a plain paper or a stamp paper. Though I am not a lawyer or know much about law, my common sence makes me to understand so. May be I am wrong!!!. But, yet, I advice you to be careful and negotiate with the employer to quit them peacefully and amicably.
2006-12-29 03:31:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Uma Nath Gore 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the basis of any contract is underpinned by the following 'offer and acceptance"- if i offer you something -and you accept, this forms the foundation of our contract, the detail is something added to ensure full disclosure, terms and conditions etc, penalties and the like if and when they apply, a letter head or company stamp does not make a contract- if you signed an agreement in writing between yourself and another party and this was witnessed by a third party ( not necessary but prudent) you have a contract. you do not specify the contents of the contract- if there is no express mention of the time duration - ie. 24 months then you may well have a loophole or escape option- but check first.
2006-12-26 21:01:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if he actually signed the contract, so there probably isn't any legal issue here. But the fact that Donovan made a big deal out of talking about how he wanted to coach in the NBA (so he didn't have to spend time recruiting, etc.) and now backs out of it makes him look like a jerk. And as for not wanting a coach around who doesn't want to be there, what about U of F? Donovan obviously isn't happy there because he talked with Kentucky and Orlando, maybe just to drive up his price at Florida. If I'm Florida, I wouldn't take him back.
2016-05-23 10:00:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nancy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Certainly. If he proved that he worked for 18 months, whether a contract existed or not he deemed to be a regular employee.
2006-12-30 05:48:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by naren 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. You could have written on leaves and you signed it then you are bound to it.
2006-12-26 20:54:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Arashikitty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yup..You signed it, it does not matter what kind of paper it's on
2006-12-26 20:59:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by MC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, of course you can be sued
you will probably win, but the employer can sue
2006-12-27 03:26:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by BigD 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it has your signature and there are written terms and conditions I would say so !!
2006-12-26 20:56:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by dadacoolone 5
·
0⤊
0⤋