English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1227/p09s02-coop.html

2006-12-26 20:03:04 · 10 answers · asked by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5 in Politics & Government Elections

10 answers

I'm beginning to think so. The voters have the ability to limit the term of any president, by not re-electing him or her.

2006-12-26 23:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1 0

What a gaggle of Yahoos you Conservatives are! a million) it somewhat is cheating to declare that "Democrats" oftentimes choose for something while it somewhat is in basic terms one in a million or much less Democrats who choose for it. 2) And it somewhat is not pretty intelligent to bounce to the top that that variety interior the regulation could make Obama a king or dictator, for the reason that variety could have not have been given something to do with the requirement that Obama run for the presidency each 4 years and WIN? As a Democrat, i'm overjoyed to work out that even you Republicans know that Obama is so tremendous which you will no longer think of any Republican ever beating him interior the destiny. 3) finally, after any substitute to our shape passes the two properties of Congress, it may in basic terms bypass into effect AFTER it somewhat is been authorized via 34 of the 50 states approve the substitute. With Democrats in many circumstances prevailing 20 of the states and the Republicans 30, what's the possibility that the Democrats ought to get 13 Republican states to connect the 20 states? ZIP! If there are any sensible Republicans around, why could you go with for to adhere with the form of Yahoos that placed up here? Come connect us the individuals with shown intelligence and integrity, the liberal Democratic social gathering.

2016-10-19 00:50:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, we should not. I have only two reasons: One becasue we need a positive difference for our country or the world and secondly, we need our president to take rest and have fund, after great hardship and risk to life and family.

2006-12-26 20:12:17 · answer #3 · answered by Lay Vicheka 1 · 0 1

Yes. They were created out of the Republican fear after FDR...and if it means Bill Clinton can take a third term, I'm all for it.

2006-12-26 20:06:14 · answer #4 · answered by fenwaysteve 1 · 2 0

In time of war or national emergency acknowledged by congress (not like they ever acknowledge anything, anyway), yes.

2006-12-26 20:10:30 · answer #5 · answered by Tyrone 2 · 0 0

We pick pretty crappy presidents if they need the incentive of re-election to do what is right.

2006-12-26 20:13:45 · answer #6 · answered by trueblue88 5 · 1 0

yes we should. its an outdated rule, just like the impractical and stupid electoral college.

2006-12-27 01:45:51 · answer #7 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 1 0

Let the people decide.

2006-12-26 20:11:26 · answer #8 · answered by Alfretz T 3 · 1 0

in fact one four year term is plenty. that article is crap it was ghost written by karl rove. and since you cant trust the elections anymore..............

2006-12-26 20:05:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

NO WAY

2006-12-26 20:10:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers