THEY THOUGHT ABOUT IT BEFORE THEY FINALIZED THE IVERSON DEAL.
2006-12-30 11:08:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by smitty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why wouldnt they try and trade Earl Boykins? I mean for one they wont get anything out of him. But it wouldnt be a bad move at all, his contributions are very limited and now that AI is in the picture his minutes will lower dramatically. He is not anything special.
Whoever said something about trying to move AI to the PG position...AI has ALWAYS played PG, that is is position and thats what he was brought to the Nuggets to do. He replaced Andre Miller who was Nuggets starting PG before AI and him switched teams, Boykins did not start.
2006-12-26 22:06:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by wcbaseball4 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boykins could have a beginning interest for a whilst, yet whilst Williams gets returned, that is going to likely be returned on the bench. i do no longer basically like the commerce, and Karl did no longer like it the two. i be attentive to they desire to eliminate cap room, yet they could are starting to be to be atleast a 2nd rounder out of it too. Steve Blake isn't somewhat certainly one of those participant that strikes lots interest, he did look sturdy whilst he performed for Maryland, yet i think they desire a passer, atleast he would not turn the ball over alot. Matt Carroll from Charlotte is who i could have traded for individually, could have been sturdy for the two communities.
2016-10-28 11:06:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know, they don't have a back up PG then. But when J.R. is back, iverson and boykins won't be playing together like they are now, so that is probably why.
2006-12-27 02:12:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by D$ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have no idea. I guess they want to make A.I. a point guard. That would be a very bad move!
2006-12-26 20:11:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was the man when he was in GS Warriors. We loved him!
2006-12-26 19:45:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably just because hes getting kind of old? Idk why they would either but thats the only reason i can think of
2006-12-26 20:41:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adam 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when did they consider that??
2006-12-26 21:20:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anubhav~~!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because he is two feet nothing...
2006-12-26 20:26:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋