Say that by then, overpopulation and most disparities are solved/gotten over.
2006-12-26 18:59:50 · 11 answers · asked by twintree 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If they could, it would be a bad idea even if there was no hunger and war, etc.
Why?
There is no way people in the US can uunderstand the needs of bushmen in Africa or vice versa. YOu'd end up with large population countries like China and the US dominating the small ones in elections, and backwater places getting hozed.
The world would turn into the AMerican state of Pennsylvania. If you go county by county in the state of Pennsylvania, all but two counties are Republican. Pennsylvania frequently goes to the Democrats during the Presidential elections. Why? ecause Philidelphia and Pittsburgh have as many people in them as the rest of the state combined.
The truth is such a large "nation" would be more fairly and more efficiently run by a dictator than a democracy, but that would only work if the dictator actually wanted to be fair. Human nature being what it is, they never do want to be fair.
2006-12-27 00:53:58 · answer #1 · answered by 0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've heard for years that's where it is all headed. With the U.N. it doesn't seem that far fetched.
Also, I've been hearing for years that the money system will eventually end up in one currency for the entire world. Things like super computers in Europe will have everybody in the databases. They will have our total identities, they will want everybody to be microchipped so they can keep track of our money. You'll be scanned everytime you buy or sell and more.
I've been hearing all this since the 80's. The super computers and the mirco chips are already a reality.
I guess we'll just have to see what happens.
2006-12-26 19:11:20 · answer #2 · answered by Suzanne 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Salam :) i'm a Muslim teen residing in Canada. I positioned on hijab alhamdullilah and that's for the most section customary right here considering i stay in a huge city with a huge Muslim inhabitants. I do get the few ignorant comments and idiots in school although who ask stuff like "yo were given a bomb lower than there hahaha". besides the indisputable fact that the hardest section is being diverse out of your human beings. Being a Muslim, activities, alcohol courting boys wearing revealing clothing and so on is haram, and at the same time as i do not favor to attempt this besides, it may be somewhat awkward to ought to describe why i do not do it to those who evaluate it basically element of being an adolescent and its uncomplicated to them. Muslims residing in Muslim international locations actually have it less difficult at the same time as it comprises installation in. And with nutrition it may be somewhat problematical yet I continually attempt to study the label if i'm not confident of the elements. yet i does not wanna be the different faith no count number how confusing it receives and how diverse i trust from anybody else, i'm satisfied to be Muslim :)
2016-12-01 05:23:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, no. A single monolithic government like that would inevitably be abused and turned into a totalitarian dictatorship, Stalin's wet dream as it were. Such is the problem with government, I guess.
2006-12-26 19:04:23 · answer #4 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well as the case maybe we have already swandered the net worth of our country doing just that until we played in to the hands of osama who is smart enough to understand bad players in the world and how to make them even worse than they are, with the guilt trip mind set of America were easy pickin for his hit and run tactics, when the world has enough money once again to take on what you ask we will not be in the forefront of it, because we never wanted this job in the first place and now it is worth more to the government to waste our lives on their wants now, it wont be a future thing it is already here and eating the country to death and the behavioral sciences have figured to replace us with mexicans to make it last a little longer, how cheap
2006-12-27 11:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by bev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so for two reasons. First humans tend to be rather tribalistic in nature, I really don't think we'll ever get rid of wars. Second the potential for corruption and abuse would be elevated in such a monolithic government.
2006-12-26 19:18:08 · answer #6 · answered by the_mad_yovo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This single government will be in effect when Christ rules for 1000 years. Man will never be able to bring this about successfully.
2006-12-26 19:12:35 · answer #7 · answered by Marie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will eventually happen.When all the resources of earth will be for the benefit of mankind.No more wars.Imagine
2006-12-26 19:12:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats what the biblical predictions are, one government, one religion.
2006-12-26 19:14:21 · answer #9 · answered by flamingo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would they want to?
2006-12-26 19:03:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋