i an pointing to her hunger strike.
2006-12-26 18:48:32 · 8 answers · asked by suvankar chakraborty 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She wants to protect farmers
Nowadays, land is the costliest commodity which these industrialist are getting cheap and bulk
2006-12-26 19:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by Mast 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mamata Banerjee has made sure that there is no future for the present generation of talented graduates to find decent employment and a respectable wage to look forward to in West Bengal. It is clear that future investments of any size is not going to happen in West Bengal. When all this is over, I am confident Chief Minister Buddha will come out smelling of roses whichever path he chooses to take.
2006-12-26 19:08:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in past , in present , or in future .....she was , is , will be A BIG ZERO only in west bengal ... . She is now on hunger-strike not to save the farmers because they are already on the side of communists.... To show her angriness over continous failiures for past 35 years...she is doing so now....but it will have a NULL Effect there....Already the farmers who had lost their lands for industry construction ....had requested Mrs.Mamata to finish her hunger strike because they were satisfied with the government fully.... But...she continued with showing some duplicate people as farmers on her side ...but they were actually a rented ones....West Bengal goverment had arrested all the 9 and enquiring their Bio-datas....I think in one week or other ..... They will unmask the Mamata's face by proving them as rented persons from somewhere ....
2006-12-27 22:03:18 · answer #3 · answered by Mahe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mamata Banerjee is a FIRE Ball in our Indian Politics she knows what she is doing ,same thing which earlior CPI / CPM and other West Bengal's political parties were doing in the past for the power and popularty for next elections in W.Bengal ?
2006-12-26 20:43:02 · answer #4 · answered by deepaklbhatia 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mamata Benerjee has exposed the duealness of left, who says one thing at Delhi and do another in Kolkata. Now urban educated are of the illusion that by simple giving thousands of acres to some industrialists we can change the face of India.
You see still 93 per cent of employment is based on rural sector. Even we can some 200 per cent growth in IT or industry sector the increase in total employment is only one per cent. WHy dont Tatas some some MLNs compete and purchase lands, but want to take lands at cheap prices from govt. ? Even govt. can spare lands, but why only irrigated lands, where two or three crops are coming ?
You know agricultural production is coming down and productivity also coming down. Why countries like US and Europe, where hardly three to four percent of population depent on agriculture, fighting at WTO to protect their farmers ? If we lose agriculture, we lose our sovernity. Mind it. Governments now dancing to the tine of World Bank, backed by US, to protect their interests, not our interests.
2006-12-26 20:45:03 · answer #5 · answered by naren 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why no one can question land grabbing by big industrialists like Tata and Amabani?. She is right.
2006-12-26 21:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
emotional blackmailing of people, administration and government ...
2006-12-28 00:15:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
'save rights'
[i think so]
2006-12-26 18:56:56 · answer #8 · answered by Jupiter the spark 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋