that it should be televised?What purpose would that serve?
2006-12-26 17:36:19 · 18 answers · asked by sistablu...Maat 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
that would be sick and spread more hatred into the world. as responsible and mature adults we dont want to do that. but its sad that george bush wasnt second in line. that would do justice for the lives lost during the war
2006-12-26 17:45:46 · answer #1 · answered by listlessbutdiligent 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
no good purpose would be served. It is best done in private, this is not the dark ages or neanderthal times.
animals who live by saddams standards who would make his execution even MORE brutal and inhuman would likely be the same kind of tyrant, monster if given power.
IT HAS TO END SOMEWHERE.
2006-12-27 01:56:28 · answer #2 · answered by larrydoyle52 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whos next?
Maybe a lil injection for Bush and "accidentially" miss the vein to have him suffer for 30 mins like Diaz did?
They should release Saddam and have him bring back Iraq to order again.
Since he was gone there have been more innocent people killed than in the time where he was in power.
2006-12-27 01:42:51 · answer #3 · answered by ganja_claus 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It will be in many countries, but I'm sure it won't be in America..We have this false notion that it may traumatize some or in-sensitize some because of the violence. It's funny, because people are starved for reality shows and rubber neck every accident hoping to see blood and bodies.
2006-12-27 01:42:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I had a history professor that never required you to know the name of an assassin. He thought their names should disappear from history and never be said again. They deserve no fame for their deeds. Saddam does not deserve the attention: he is in capable hands and will meet his fate. Proof is not necessary. It is only necessary to know that a man and his sons met their fate for their crimes against humanity.
2006-12-27 02:08:26 · answer #5 · answered by towanda 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No no and no. I don't even think he should be hanged. Come on it's 21st century and we still hang people. It's not even funny. It's not like I am defending Saddam,, but come on electrical chair would be better or at least life imprisonment
2006-12-27 01:48:36 · answer #6 · answered by Kitana 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It probably won't be televised but expect it on the internet within a few weeks.
2006-12-27 01:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by Billy T 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1) That would be SICK!!!
2)Saddam was no saint, but this is all a political maneuver based on the ownership of PETROL!! Saddam was just a handy excuse, so I don't think he should hang at ALL!!! Imprisioned, maybe...
Shame on you, Mr. Bush.
2006-12-27 01:38:58 · answer #8 · answered by veevintage 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
that's pretty sick and is an extremely humiliating and preverted thing to do. it shouldn't be such a hype. Reminds me of George Orwell's 1984 where the kids get all excited to see a public execution. Scary thought! Thoroughly gross and sick!!
2006-12-27 02:14:30 · answer #9 · answered by justmyinput 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not.
If he has to be hung it's too bad he doesn't have the company of George Bush being hung next to him for war crimes.
2006-12-27 01:43:20 · answer #10 · answered by frozen13245 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋