Dont they realize that he is committed to protecting America in every way he can?
2006-12-26 15:19:08 · 25 answers · asked by Gary 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ARE YOU BLIND ,DEAF,AND DUMB>??????OPEN YOUR FUKING EYES AND EARS .....PROTECTING OIL INTERESTS YES ,,,AMERICA NO.....LETS GO OVER THIS ONE MORE TIME FOR ALL YOU STUPID FUKING REPUBLICANS WHO RODE THE SHORT BUS.....WHERE ARE THESE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?????AND EXACTLY HOW MANY OF THE 911 ATTACKERS CAME FROM IRAQ????AND DO YOU REALIZE THAT THESE SO CALLED INSURGENTS AND TERRORISTS THAT ATTACK OUR TROOPS ON A DAILY BASIS ARENT INDIGENOUS TO IRAQ THEY ARE THERE BECAUSE WE ARE THERE ....WAKE UP
2006-12-26 15:46:47 · answer #1 · answered by STOP CORRUPTION NOW 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I use to support Bush, I voted for the asshole the first time. But after 6 years of listening to his habitual lying one can only take so much.
I hate the the bastard, and wish that the congress would impeach him and put a rope around his neck for this senseless mess he's created in Iraq.
Today they announced that saddam will be executed within 30 days. When this happens the all Hell is going to break loose in Iraq. Mark my words. If you think things are bad now, wait until they execute saddam hussein.
We haven't seen nothing compared to what will happen once he is executed.
Another thought here, UN has now moved forward with sanctions on Iran. The president has decided to beef up the naval forces in the persian gulf by sending a carrier battle group.
If the president uses this battle group to destroy the nuclear facilities in Iran, he better be prepared for total war in the mideast, and retaliation with shore to ship missiles attacks against our Naval ships in the gulf.
Iran has the most sophisticated anti-ship missiles in the world at the present time. Given the short distance it would have to travel and the speed of their anti-ship missile there is a very high probability we could lose an entire carrier battle group if they attack it.
Bush is a mad man, and his policies have only served to create an endless supply of future terrorists for all the world to worry about.
2006-12-26 15:42:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Liberals aren't the only people attacking the President. Have you heard Pat Buchanan lately? Conservatives are attacking him too.
And no, they don't "realize that he is committed to protecting America in every way he can." Why? Because he isn't. I will just tell you one way out of ten bazillions ways he isn't. He allows anything to come into our ports without being inspected. Crates come in the size of tractor trailers filled with furniture from Vietnam, crap toys from China and everything else that we import, and he has no one on that. Nobody!
How do I know this? My husband imports furniture.
So, he has all of us being strip-searched at airports to make it look like we are being "protected" and he has the useless alarming "red" and "orange" alerts, but basically, a suitcase bomb could be coming over on a ship right now.
Yeah, Bush makes me feel really really "protected."
2006-12-26 15:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
So just how many of us, innocent civilians, does he have to kill in order to protect us? Is he protecting us, or is he using 18 Saudi's with box cutters as the excuse for bombing a sovereign nation that wouldn't let our Big Oil Conglomerates acquire any business investments? Where's all the new investment in energy technologies that will end our need to procure oil illegally or import it from those who have ill will against us? Just because he and his cronies can't figure out an acceptable agreement to privatize their oil without including the factions that live there shouldn't be our problem.
Jimmy Carter's goal (energy plan) would have enabled us to decrase our demand for oil by 20% in the year 2000. Why would that be so bad?
An enemy of the state is an enemy of the state, regardless of the name. It just so happens that our greatest enemy has occupation as our President. You want liberals to quit attacking, tell your boy to get with the program.
How many times would you allow someone to dry fornicate your cornhole before you got mad? Unless of course--you like it!!
2006-12-26 15:41:59 · answer #4 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
lower than that hypothesis he also prevented devil from taking on the earth, besides are you extremely going to credit him with reactionary safe practices measures that maximum different u . s . had in position beforehand we did? seek for suggestion from with a foreigner about how stunning our airports replaced into once. we've not chased terrorists into the Philippines, Indonesia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone. i wager dropping 5000 youthful adult males and women human beings in international locations which will quickly ignore us when we go away is a fine looking thanks to ward off a chance attacks. even if dude. Your also the range of guy who would blame 9/11 on the Clinton regulations, for no different reason than you does not choose responsible Bush Sr. or Reagan(who put in Saddam a million.0). with the help of this procedure any attack lower than Obama's watch would fall squarely on Bush, even although we may be able to anticipate he replaced into doing his superb snoozing interior the air preserve.
2016-12-01 05:17:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes I think they just have too much time on their hands, sometimes I think they are just ignorant to spend so much time saying the same old things over and over. If it were me I would get tired of hearing myself.
No they don't get that he is committed to protecting America. They are in denial that America is in danger. But just wait til the Democrats start up and America gets a good whiff of that stuff. Things will change.
2006-12-26 15:46:01 · answer #6 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's protecting America, yes, but he's got another agenda, which is one of the reasons he gets attacked. I don't think it's fair to say that its' just Liberals relentlessly attacking him because people from all political backgrounds and beliefs attack him.
He lied about a lot of things and those things started to reveal themselves (like all lies eventually do)...why do you think many members of his cabinet resigned recently and why do you suppose lots of Republicans voted Democrat this year? There's a method to the madness. But it doesn't matter who's president, she or he will be attacked no matter what.
2006-12-26 15:24:51 · answer #7 · answered by Quintessa 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Funny, very funny. Liberals attack Dumbya because there's nothing to praise him for. He hasn't done squat. When he leaves office (make it soon, dear God, please!), people will look back upon these 8 years of his reign and wonder why we never accomplished anything other than getting bogged down in a no-win war in Iraq that has cost so many lives.
2006-12-26 16:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Their leaders are doing nothing for them to be happy about, so they take it out on Bush. Hopefully, once the Dems take control of Congress in January, the Liberals will start to discuss the various legislation being offered by the many factions within the Democratic party. Right now, Bush is all they have to hate.
2006-12-26 15:34:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Perhaps we don't see it that way. Invading Iraq is not protecting America. Infringing on the Constitution is not protecting America. The Patriot Act is far from Patriotic, I have a problem wit any legislator who voted for that mess.
We just love our country too much to see it be governed in such a heinous way.
2006-12-26 15:26:31 · answer #10 · answered by vertical732 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
"Why do liberals attack the President relentlessly?"
Well, you know the way he is? Well...he's like that every day.
"Dont they realize that he is committed to protecting America in every way he can?"
The closest he ever came to protecting America was when he almost choked on that pretzel.
2006-12-26 15:34:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋