Grandpa Prescott was.....wasn't he?
2006-12-26 13:56:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your right somewhat! They are pointing fingers at Bush for getting us into a war over oil with a people that had done nothing to America, and "yes" Bush should have gotten his facts straight, and came up with a provable reason to go to war with Saddam so that he could legally kill the enemy of his Daddy, but as usual he blundered his way to war! Then to make matter's worse, Bush didn't forsee the enormous cost of sending us to war, nor did he seem to really care, nor did he understand the amount of innocent lives that would be taken as a result. Is it his fault? "YES" it is! Bush should have come up with a plan for the gradual withdrawal of our troops once Saddam was captured, but "no" he now wants complete control of Iraq as a way of taunting his enemy. We have no business there, and we should let those people settle thier own affairs! We had a Civil War in this Country to settle our affairs, and now we have a better Government as a result, and a consistent way of life, that recognizes the diversity of the multi-racial/ multi-cultural people of this Country. We still have a few problems that we need to workout such as: Erradicating racism completly or legally, Gun control, Court reform, automatic/ systematic Minimum Wage raises, and enacting Police anti-brutality laws.
It seems apparent that we need a new Leader, as Bush has failed us as he seemingly has had "No Plan" that has been productive, practical, and prosperous for the Middle and Lower Classes of people in this Country. His policies have ultimately been very divisive and destructive to the welfare of the masses, without posing any suitable alternatives to our current or previous situations. Under the Bush administration, crime is rampant, the economy is faltering, and our response to our own people in crises( Katrina and Rita) is atrocious, and was thought to be blamed on racism/ republicanism/ compassionate conservatism! We can't truly blame anything on the Democrat's cause the Bush Admintsration has largely undone most of the Clinton Adminstration's efforts and replaced them with their own. Wake up AMERICA! It's time for change once again!!!
2006-12-26 14:16:37 · answer #1 · answered by The Idealist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He isn't a nazi...party of nazism is antisemitism. I don't see any evidence of that.
He is, however, a statist and not a liberal. He has disregarded the constitutional liberties that have served this country well. His record on personal freedom (abortion, gay rights, drug war, etc) is abismal and at the same time, his economic positions and corporate welfare make the Democrats look like Milton Friedman.
I think calling him a nazi is unfair... he has not engaged in genoicide or anything like that.
That being said, his administration has been an insult to the liberal and libertarian principles that this country was founded upon.
2006-12-26 14:12:05 · answer #2 · answered by Ray 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, of course not, thought as stated his grandfather was well linked to nazi's. President Bush is extremely pro jew, zionism, and Isreal, which is why there would be no way for him to be a nazi if he supports jew's so much. He is a good politician and a fairly smart businessman, like his father.
2006-12-26 14:05:41 · answer #3 · answered by brabusboy818 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That guy proves his lack of understanding further and extra prevalent. If I have been him; i could in basic terms close my mouth and stroll out of the white domicile silently. i'm specific he will finally get too delicate and not have as many secret amenities around him. i'm specific somebody someplace is probably waiting to attend to him.
2016-10-19 00:37:44 · answer #4 · answered by mulry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No George bush is not a Nazi But he sure acts like one. Grandpa Prescott wasn't either although he did support them and made a fortune off of them
2006-12-26 14:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
No, just an incredibly bad President who has made many disastrous mistakes, the greatest of which is Iraq. The world will celebrate when this tyrant leaves office in disgrace in two more years.
2006-12-26 14:05:17 · answer #6 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
A nazi is a national socialist. I dont think that fits Bush.
Bush is much more of an internationalist with all the free trade and what not.
2006-12-26 14:00:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Joe Kennedy Sr was an appeaser to Hitler.. FDR fired his butt as Ambassador to Great Britain.
2006-12-26 14:01:15 · answer #8 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You ignorant *** holes have no clue of what a Nazi was is or what they did to this world. If you think 40 million dead is something to joke about you are sick!
2006-12-26 14:01:51 · answer #9 · answered by ngo 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
he sure was. the us government took away his land for treasonist acts, but that crafty senator got it back, with a little help from his skull and bones friends. but the grandson, no.
2006-12-26 14:00:50 · answer #10 · answered by mumtaz 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋