2006-12-26 13:38:05 · 21 answers · asked by Wheel'in 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your right somewhat! They are pointing fingers at Bush for getting us into a war over oil with a people that had done nothing to America, and "yes" Bush should have gotten his facts straight, and came up with a provable reason to go to war with Saddam so that he could legally kill the enemy of his Daddy, but as usual he blundered his way to war! Then to make matter's worse, Bush didn't forsee the enormous cost of sending us to war, nor did he seem to really care, nor did he understand the amount of innocent lives that would be taken as a result. Is it his fault? "YES" it is! Bush should have come up with a plan for the gradual withdrawal of our troops once Saddam was captured, but "no" he now wants complete control of Iraq as a way of taunting his enemy. We have no business there, and we should let those people settle thier own affairs! We had a Civil War in this Country to settle our affairs, and now we have a better Government as a result, and a consistent way of life, that recognizes the diversity of the multi-racial/ multi-cultural people of this Country. We still have a few problems that we need to workout such as: Erradicating racism completly or legally, Gun control, Court reform, automatic/ systematic Minimum Wage raises, and enacting Police anti-brutality laws.
It seems apparent that we need a new Leader, as Bush has failed us as he seemingly has had "No Plan" that has been productive, practical, and prosperous for the Middle and Lower Classes of people in this Country. His policies have ultimately been very divisive and destructive to the welfare of the masses, without posing any suitable alternatives to our current or previous situations. Under the Bush administration, crime is rampant, the economy is faltering, and our response to our own people in crises( Katrina and Rita) is atrocious, and was thought to be blamed on racism/ republicanism/ compassionate conservatism! We can't truly blame anything on the Democrat's cause the Bush Admintsration has largely undone most of the Clinton Adminstration's efforts and replaced them with their own. Wake up AMERICA! It's time for change once again!!!
2006-12-26 13:45:18 · answer #1 · answered by The Idealist 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
A majority of the terrorists who hijacked the planes on September 11, were from Saudi Arabia, the fact is we never attacked the right country, we attacked Iraq to secure oil interests for the American government, we attacked Afghanistan to have more control of the opium trade, suspicious that there was never a shortage of heroin in America.
2006-12-26 13:54:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
this may well be authentic. remember whilst Osama claimed accountability for the black out? Then it became later chanced on it became a load of bull. in line with threat 911 became carried out so Bush could purposely invade troops into afghanistan and attempt to combat the upward push of radical terror there (because of the fact the Taliban have been like the Iranians of immediately, believed in the destruction of Israel and Islam and the only faith of the international) yet this entire allegation is stupid. The morals of u.s. could could be incredibly low to sacrifice 3000 lives and economic and morale injury to the individuals u.s.. attempt to look at issues greater realistically. Lol. - From a 7 12 months previous boy whom had nightmares approximately 9/11 for 3 years.
2016-10-28 10:41:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha ha ha! Can anyone explain why you think that attacking another country means that we stop going after the people that are responsible for 911?
2006-12-26 13:43:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The U.S did not attack itself after 9/11. They only did on 9/11 because it was an inside job that was planned and carried out by elements of our own government. Very clear if the research is done, absolutlely undeniable.
2006-12-26 15:16:44 · answer #5 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"When I was a kid I remember that they used to put out there in the Old West a wanted poster. It said, Wanted: Dead or Alive." (referring to Bin laden) —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C. Sept. 18, 2001
"I don't know where he is.(referring to Bin laden) It's not that important. It's not our priority" George W. Bush, Washington D.C.Mar. 15 2002
2006-12-26 13:49:56 · answer #6 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oil
2006-12-26 13:59:22 · answer #7 · answered by bldudas 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the people responsible for 9/11 ran to that country!!!!
2006-12-26 13:43:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is a good question, and honestly the only one who can answer is the Bush Administration.
2006-12-26 13:47:17 · answer #9 · answered by j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush didn't want to mess up his streak of failure in everything he ever did in his life and we were getting to close to catching OBL.
2006-12-26 14:12:33 · answer #10 · answered by Al Dave Ismail 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋