English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

somtimes i think nobody undrstand me except me so translating thinking into words is realy somthing important and not that easy it depens on what are you thinking about ,,

2006-12-26 13:34:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

11 answers

Your self as speaker, writer, reader, is like iron on the anvil; to work it you need it red hot, pounding with a hammer, shaping with your tools, stressing and straining, working against your negative self, hearing your positive self and asking your self questions in your doubt.

Here is some 'iron' to pound on:

'§ 1583

As each of the objects is posited as self-contradictory and self-sublating in its own self, it is only by an external compulsion [Gewalt] that they are held apart from one another and from their reciprocal integration. Now the middle term whereby these extremes are concluded into a unity is first the implicit nature of both, the whole Notion that holds both within itself. Secondly, however, since in their concrete existence they stand confronting each other, their absolute unity is also a still formal element having an existence distinct from them — the element of communication in which they enter into external community with each other. Since the real difference belongs to the extremes, this middle term is only the abstract neutrality, the real possibility of those extremes; it is, as it were, the theoretical element of the concrete existence of chemical objects, of their process and its result. In the material world water fulfils the function of this medium; in the spiritual world, so far as the analogue of such a relation has a place there, the sign in general, and more precisely language, is to be regarded as fulfilling that function.'

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hl/hlobject.htm#HL3_729

And here for your vocabularic expansion: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/li_terms.htm


'Unity of opposites

The principles of the metaphysical philosophy gave rise to the belief that, when cognition lapsed into contradictions, it was a mere accidental aberration, due to some subjective mistake in argument and inference. According to Kant, however, thought has a natural tendency to issue in contradictions or antinomies, whenever it seeks to apprehend the infinite. We have in the latter part of the above paragraph referred to the philosophical importance of the antinomies of reason, and shown how the recognition of their existence helped largely to get rid of the rigid dogmatism of the metaphysic of understanding, and to direct attention to the Dialectical movement of thought. But here too Kant, as we must add, never got beyond the negative result that the thing-in-itself is unknowable, and never penetrated to the discovery of what the antinomies really and positively mean. That true and positive meaning of the antinomies is this: that every actual thing involves a coexistence of opposed elements. Consequently to know, or, in other words, to comprehend an object is equivalent to being conscious of it as a concrete unity of opposed determinations. The old metaphysic, as we have already seen, when it studied the objects of which it sought a metaphysical knowledge, went to work by applying categories abstractly and to the exclusion of their opposites. '

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/sl/sl_iv.htm#SL48n

2006-12-26 13:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

Get a tape recorder and listen to yourself. Talking is the easiest way but I think writing is the best (you can contemplate your answers)

2006-12-26 13:45:06 · answer #2 · answered by heartmindspace 3 · 0 0

Stand in front of a mirror and talk to yourself, listen to what you say and how you say it. If you have a recording device it would be better. You can use it to actually listen to yourself from the outside, like "stepping back to see the whole picture".

2006-12-26 13:44:06 · answer #3 · answered by yornom 6 · 0 0

Read more. Sometimes the new words you discover help you put names to the things in your head. At other times you begin to realise that the concepts you have are bigger than the words that exist. Then you have to invent new words.

2006-12-26 13:44:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Steinbeck, the author, often wrote against popular ideas that he saw as common in American society.

2016-05-23 09:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If this were really easy, the world would be flooded with brilliant people.

2006-12-26 13:39:22 · answer #6 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 1 0

You could try to record your thoughts on a tape recorder.

2006-12-26 13:49:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you want to translate your thinking in words,
try different things.

you can draw, make art, write, poetry, talk, and sometimes it helps to use symbolism.

2006-12-26 13:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by Leilani 2 · 1 0

There is no easy way... only the way we know how

2006-12-27 10:26:06 · answer #9 · answered by tillermantony 5 · 0 0

draw..or think of similar( funny )situations in ur life..tht will help..remeber things..

2006-12-26 13:39:02 · answer #10 · answered by linsy 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers