English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Jim sucks, while John was great.

2006-12-26 13:24:40 · 10 answers · asked by Southpaw 7 in Entertainment & Music Other - Entertainment

10 answers

whos jim belushi??

2006-12-26 13:26:53 · answer #1 · answered by Taloam 2 · 1 0

No your right that Jim wouldn't be in the same place with out John paying the dues, but Jim is likeable, and that is more than most people who are famous these days can claim.

2006-12-26 13:28:51 · answer #2 · answered by Albert H 4 · 0 0

Jim was in it at the same time as John.

2006-12-26 13:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you are wrong. I think Jim has talent in his own right. John might have burnt out way too quickly no matter what. If Jim had no talent, he would not have lasted this long.

2006-12-26 13:28:21 · answer #4 · answered by art_tchr_phx 4 · 0 0

I think Jim has some acting talent and I give him more credit than all these other 20 million dollar guys like Tom Cruise.

2006-12-26 13:28:01 · answer #5 · answered by ♦ Phoenix Rising♦ 6 · 0 0

I disagree with your opinion. I like them both. Although, I don't think it hurt Jim that John was his brother and opened doors for him.

2006-12-26 13:28:14 · answer #6 · answered by Therese 3 · 0 0

Hey I am watching according to jim too..with dan akryod..we just had this same conversation ten mintues ago ...

2006-12-26 13:27:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's amazing. Yoko is doing fime w/o John Lennon too!

2006-12-26 13:32:12 · answer #8 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 0 0

good point. and on his TV show, I can't for the life of me understand why he was always taking off his shirt. ugh

2006-12-26 13:33:20 · answer #9 · answered by Sue Naumy 3 · 0 0

My opinion is "NO". He's just not that funny

2006-12-26 13:27:02 · answer #10 · answered by Elizabeth L 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers