for violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371?
Before you ditto headsd start your pathetic chiming that there is no proof I suggest that you read U.S. V. BUSH by Federal Prosecuter Elizabeth de la Vega.
2006-12-26 12:49:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No she is not being prosecuted for anything, or even sued regarding this work. I don't know why you ditto heads believe just because you repeat a lie makes it more true. Hitler teach you that?
2006-12-26 13:30:28 · update #1
Please support and follow the Senate Intelligence Committee-- they're digging around now and want to follow through. The problem is they haven't heard from you.
2006-12-26 12:53:01 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. The definition is conspiracy to defraud the US, right? Well, in that case, since Congress and the Senate had access to exactly the same documents as the executive branch (they really did), and they still voted for the war, then they would have to be prosecuted as well.
Elizabeth de la Vega is a kook.
2006-12-26 12:56:28 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Prosecute - possibly - with all of the information classified, it will be difficult to gather enough to convict in a court of law.
Even if he is convicted, he will either win appeal in his Supreme Court (deja vu 2000) or be pardoned by the next President.
2006-12-26 14:27:43 · answer #3 · answered by Jack C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Former presidents have lifetime secret service protection. as quickly as he's out of place of work he will have distinctive opportunities to make money from books, talking engagements, investments, etc. he will in all possibility have opportunities to serve on boards of directors. He additionally in all possibility has money being held in have confidence which will substitute into obtainable to him as quickly as he's out of place of work. No former president has ever been assassinated. Mr. Bush could be incredibly secure.
2016-10-06 01:29:20 · answer #4 · answered by hobin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elizabeth de la Vega is being prosecuted for liable.
2006-12-26 12:54:51 · answer #5 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is possible to prosecute him for looking cross-eyed at a chicken.
2006-12-26 12:53:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
you are joking right? but I think there is definate evidence that he thought he could get along with the libs and work with them for the betterment of America. For that he is guilty!
2006-12-26 12:57:28 · answer #7 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Get a life.
2006-12-26 12:53:45 · answer #8 · answered by rossj12003 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course not, dummy.
2006-12-26 12:55:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he did nothing wrong
hahahah
even Jesus can't forgive him
2006-12-26 12:51:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋